|
Chapter Eleven
The Emergence Of Diversity: Women, District
Representation, And Modernist Architecture
Dr. Dan L. Morrill
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
E-mail comments to
N4JFJ@aol.com
|
 |
|
A. G. Odell's 1966 Vision For
Center City Charlotte |
The thirty
years following the end of World War Two in Charlotte and
Mecklenburg County were anything but dull and boring. These
three decades are rivaled in importance in terms of fundamental
social and political modification only by the arrival of white
settlers in the 1740s, the defeat of the Confederacy and the end
of slavery in the 1860s, and the overpowering of Populism and
the enactment of Jim Crow laws at the turn of the last
century. Change occurred on many fronts, but all shared the
common result of increasing participation by a broader spectrum
of society in influencing and making decisions about the future
of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County.
The
decades immediately following World War II also witnessed a
major shift in the architecture of Charlotte-Mecklenburg.
Modernist architects, including A. G. Odell, Jr., J. N. Pease,
Jr., rose to prominence in Charlotte during these years and
became outspoken advocates of principles of design that rejected
traditional notions of beauty, especially the attachment of
decorative ornamentation to the outsides of buildings. Infused
with optimistic expectations of the future, architects like
Odell and Pease argued that buildings should encourage humanity
to move boldly into a bright, prosperous, and better "world of
tomorrow." "The basic tenets of Modernism emphasized function
and utility; abstract beauty, sculptural form, and symbolism;
honesty in materials, and the use of modern materials and
technology as well as an emphasis on the use of natural
materials," write historians Sherry Joines Wyatt and Sarah
Woodard. A. G. Odell, Jr. had nothing but disdain for the
architecture he observed when he arrived in Charlotte in the
late 1930s. "There was nothing
here," he remembered, "that illustrated the honesty of stone as
stone, steel as steel, glass as glass. Everybody was still
wallowing in the Colonial heritage." Odell, Pease, and other
Charlotte architects were determined to change that
circumstance.
Nobody
was predicting profound change when World War Two came to an
end. Everybody assumed that it would be "business as usual."
Indeed, during the immediate post-war years it looked as if
Charlotte’s white male business elite would continue to
monopolize local power. The process by which Independence
Boulevard came into being seemed to affirm this truth.
Independence Boulevard tore this community apart. Beneath the
deafening din of car horns and truck exhausts one can still hear
the anguished cries of the hundreds of Chantilly , Elizabeth ,
and Piedmont Park residents who gathered at Midwood School on
Central Avenue on September 8, 1946. These were desperate
people who had just learned that Mayor Herbert Baxter and the
City Council wanted to use $200,000 of local bond money to help
build a massive "cross-town boulevard" up Westmoreland Avenue,
down High Street, and across the Sunnyside Rose Garden, through
Independence Park , along Fox Street past the Douglas and Sing
Mortuary, through Cherry and the Thompson Orphanage pasture, up
Stonewall Street and down Brevard Street to end at Morehead
Street.
 |
|
Mayor Herbert Baxter |
The
protestors called it a "foolish scheme" that could "throttle
traffic between downtown and the eastern residential
districts." One irate resident suggested that the route had
been chosen because it would increase the value of the property
that Ben Douglas , District Highway Commissioner and former
Mayor, owned at what is now the intersection of Independence
Boulevard and Elizabeth Avenue. "In fact, it is strange," the
irate citizen proclaimed, "how the highway seems to seek out the
schools, the stadium, one of the few parks we have, the Rose
Garden and other such places to bring its roaring buses and
streams of cars along throughout the day and night." "Virtually
everybody who lives in the eastern part of the city will have to
cross its snake-like meandering," the group warned.
Lucille K. Tyson , an elderly lady, lived at 829 South
Brevard Street, right in the path of the proposed "cross-town
boulevard." "My thoughts may not mean so much, but I feel
pretty blue and washed up today," she lamented in a letter to
the Charlotte Observer on March 13, 1947. "Many times
I've looked out to see surveyors all around the place, our
property staked off. Again, an official sitting in a parked car
observing and figuring." Ms. Tyson felt powerless, maybe
afraid, as she saw her whole world crashing down around her and
saw no way out of her dilemma. "We work and work to enjoy a few
happy moments in our old years, knowing we do not have many more
to go. Here comes a new idea. A Super Highway! There! We
have to pick up and go," she decried. "Certainly, I feel let
down about having to lose a home. It is something to think
about when it hits you."
 |
|
John P. White |
"Somebody's toes are bound to be stepped on." That's how
Councilman John P. White , the affable, cigar-smoking,
67-year-old production manager and mechanical superintendent of
the Charlotte Observer responded to the protestors of
the proposed "cross-town boulevard." A native of Alabama, White
lived on Grandin Road in the Wesley Heights neighborhood off
West Trade Street. Like the majority of Charlotte businessmen
of that era, he was caught up in the euphoria and optimism that
gripped the country in the years immediately after World War
Two.
Exciting things were happening all over Charlotte. The
real estate market was booming, as developers like C. D.
Spangler Sr . and John Crosland labored feverishly to provide
housing for the hordes of veterans who were marrying and
beginning their families. Brides appeared in regal, white
gowns on page after page of the Sunday newspaper, serenely ready
to partake of the wonders of the newest kitchen paraphernalia.
Dishwashers. Electric can openers. WBT was about to put its FM
station on the air. Bing Crosby and Ingrid Bergman were
starring in "The Bells of St. Mary's" at the Carolina Theater.
In August 1946, Liggett Drugstore opened its lavish, modernistic
retail outlet on the northeastern corner of the Square, where
the Bank of America headquarters is now located.
This was not a time for sentimentality or restraint. "You
only look back for reasons to move ahead, and by golly nobody
can say that we lacked ideas," Mayor Baxter told journalist Kays
Gary in 1964. A handsome and personable Bostonian, Herbert
Baxter had come to Charlotte during World War One to train at
Camp Greene , had settled here, had prospered in the lumber
business, and had moved to a fine home on Queens Road in Myers
Park . "Because he was so much a doer by nature," the
Charlotte Observer reported, "he was never a precise
planner, never a man to wait to weigh every possible detail that
might go wrong." The same could have been said about Edward
Dilworth Latta , Z. V. Taylor , or most of Charlotte’s New
South leaders.
The real brain behind the building of Independence
Boulevard was James B. Marshall . Marshall Park in Uptown
Charlotte is named for him. He was a brilliant engineer who
had served as Mayor Ben Douglas 's City Manager. Born in
Anderson, South Carolina in the early 1890s, Marshall graduated
from the College of Charleston and settled in Charlotte in the
1920s. He left City government in 1941 and joined J. N. Pease
as an engineer and contact man with City Hall.
In 1946, the Charlotte Planning Board hired Marshall as a
consultant to prepare a master plan for Charlotte's streets.
Several month earlier, the North Carolina Highway Department had
conducted a comprehensive survey of local traffic trends and had
determined that Charlotte needed "cross-town boulevards" to
relieve congestion on uptown streets. The prospect of grand and
majestic expressways was music to the ears of men like Mayor
Baxter and District Highway Commissioner Douglas. They knew
that Charlotte had become a major trucking and distribution
center in the first half of the twentieth century and that
highways were essential to the local economy. Buildings such as
the Charlotte Supply Company Building and the Textile Mill
Supply Company Building attested to Charlotte's service to the
regional textile industry.
The first mention of what was to become Independence
Boulevard occurred in the Charlotte Observer on May 7,
1946. C. W. Gilchrist, Chairman of the City Planning Board,
announced that Jim Marshall had completed a street plan that
included an expressway from Graham Street eastward along
Stonewall to Sugar Creek, where it forked, one arm leading to
the Monroe and Albemarle highways, and another connecting with
Queens Road. On June 4th, City Council adopted Marshall's
master scheme, even though the exact route of the cross-town
boulevard was still undecided.
The issue did not surface again until September 1946, when
word leaked out that the expressway would split the Chantilly ,
Elizabeth , and Piedmont Park neighborhoods. A throng of
infuriated citizens packed the City Council meeting on September
10th, and their spokesman, attorney Frank K. Sims, Jr ., accused
the City of being secretive and manipulative. They had good
reason to be mad. The group had not even seen a map of the
proposed route. Mayor Baxter assured the neighborhood leaders
that the location of the expressway was still up in the air; he
directed City Manager Henry A. Yancey to release maps of the
cross-town boulevard; and he promised the protestors that they
would have ample time to express their concerns.
On October 8, 1946, the City Council gathered for an
informal dinner at the Myers Park County Club, where Mayor
Baxter was president. In those days it was customary for the
Councilmen to decide issues in private and then to emerge like
the College of Cardinals and cast their pre-determined votes.
Imagine what the scene must have been like. There in the midst
of Myers Park, with fine china, cut crystal, and sumptuous food
on the table, the representatives of the people endorsed the
route through Chantilly , Elizabeth , and Piedmont Park .
That's how deals were struck in those days. Baxter and his
colleague were following a well-traveled path -- no pun
intended.
On October 21, 1946, the outraged residents of the affected
neighborhoods descended upon City Hall for a public hearing.
The atmosphere was tense and electric. "Isn't it a little
absurd," Frank Sims remarked, "to build a highway that winds and
twists and turns across a park and baseball diamond and over a
rose garden and through a thickly populated residential section
just to reach Ben Douglas 's property?"
Mayor Baxter and the Councilmen did modify their position
in the face of this fierce public opposition, at least in terms
of the preferred route. They instructed Jim Marshall and Henry
Yancey to come up with alternative routes for the expressway.
At 2:00 p.m. on November 12, 1946, the City Council toured
eastern Charlotte to examine three prospective rights-of-way.
One was the original route up Westmoreland Avenue and through
Independence Park , from which the cross-town boulevard
eventually took its name. A second used Westmoreland but turned
left on Hawthorne Lane to Fourth Street and continued across
Sugar Creek to Stonewall. The third spared Chantilly ,
Elizabeth , Piedmont Park , the Sunnyside Rose Garden, and
Independence Park by entering the city along Monroe Road,
swinging left past the railroad overpass to connect with
Randolph Road, continuing to the intersection of Queens Road and
Fourth Street, then moving through the Cherry neighborhood to
Morehead Street, and proceeding along Morehead to South
Boulevard.
City Council approved the third route by a vote of 5 to 1
on November 25, 1946. Ponder what that decision would have
meant for the Eastover and Crescent Heights neighborhoods and
the Mint Museum of Art . But this route was never built,
because the Federal government, the principal financier of the
project, rejected it outright as unsuitable for an expressway.
On December 5, 1946, the Councilmen took up the issue again.
For a while it looked like Charlotte would never decide the
issue of where to build Independence Boulevard . The members of
City Council seemed to be hopelessly divided, two favoring the
original route, two supporting Hawthorne Lane, and two opposing
the road regardless of its route.
City
Councilman John P. White saved the day. He persuaded Ross
Puette and Henry Newson to abandon Hawthorne Lane and back the
original route. "By jingo, at one point there, I thought I was
going to have to switch to Hawthorne Lane myself," White
laughed. Such were the fickle ways of politics in those
days. The battle was not over. City Council approved the
contract with the Federal government on March 11, 1947, but the
opponents threatened to sue the City for misuse of local bond
money. The next City Council had to reaffirm its support for
the project in June 1947. The momentum to build the cross-town
boulevard was irreversible. And we all live with the
consequences -- good and bad.
| |
|
Dr. Elmer Garinger |
Few Charlotteans noticed when Bonnie E. Cone , a
mathematics teacher at Central High School , was named the
director of the Charlotte Center of the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1947. The school was a temporary
facility created to educate veterans. Cone's appointment to head
the institution turned out to be a momentous event and a
harbinger of significant change. A woman of indomitable will
and determination, Cone began almost immediately laying plans to
make the school a permanent institution of higher education.
"It is doubtful that city leaders fully anticipated at the
beginning the ramifications of having a major university in
their midst," writes Ken Sanford in his history of Charlotte
College and UNCC . "However," Sanford continues, "the coming
of state-supported higher education to Charlotte set in motion a
sequence of events that would forever change Charlotte and its
greater region."
 |
|
Charlotte College at Central High
School |
The creation of Charlotte College in 1949 as a
municipal-financed institution and its eventual transformation
into the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in 1965 was
a seminal development in the history of this community, perhaps
as notable as the arrival of Alexander Craighead in 1758, the
coming of the first railroad to town in 1852, and the opening
of the Charlotte Cotton Mills in 1881. So profound was the
impact of Cone's attainments that one must place her
accomplishments even above those of Jane Smedburg Wilkes, in
this writer's opinion the second most important woman in
Charlotte-Mecklenburg history.
"Charlotte College wouldn't be where it is now if it
hadn't been for her," said Board chairperson J. Murrey Atkins
about Bonnie Cone . Bonnie Ethel Cone was born on June 22,
1907, in Lodge, South Carolina, a tiny railroad town of some 200
people located roughly midway between Columbia and Charleston.
Reared in a conservative Baptist home, Cone acquired a love of
teaching as a young child. Her first students were the animals
on her father's farm. "I taught every little animal around in
those fantastic years," she told a reporter many years later.
"I knew from the time I started to school that I wanted to be a
teacher." Always an excellent student, Cone graduated from
Coker College, a private liberal arts college in Hartsville,
South Carolina, in 1928 with a B.S. in mathematics. She taught
in the public schools of South Carolina until 1940.
Bonnie Cone earned an M.A. in mathematics from Duke
University and moved to Charlotte in 1941 to teach the same
subject at Central High School . The school's principal, Dr.
Elmer H. Garinger , was most impressed with Cone's intelligence
and instructional abilities. In 1943, Cone returned to Duke to
work as a statistician for a U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory.
After a brief stint in Washington, D.C., she returned to Central
High School in 1946 and resumed her career as a high school
mathematics instructor. Not surprisingly, Elmer Garinger
recruited Bonnie Cone also to be a part-time teacher in the
newly-opened Charlotte Center of the University of North
Carolina. She taught mathematics to engineering students.
In August 1947, Garinger summoned Cone to his office and
asked her to become the Director of the Charlotte Center,
because the first occupant of that position had returned to
Chapel Hill. "I took the job of director only as a temporary
position," she explained. "I had prepared myself for high
school teaching, and that's what I wanted to do." Cone's
administrative office was formerly the Lost and Found Room at
Central High School . Cone did not own an automobile. She rode
a bus to campus from a house where she rented a single room.
She had no administrative experience beyond the classroom or
what she might have acquired working for the Navy.
|
 |
|
Dr. Bonnie E. Cone |
Everybody assumed that Cone had taken a dead-end job.
Indeed, it is unlikely that Chapel Hill would have allowed a
woman to assume the position if the job had appeared to have
had any prospects of becoming permanent. "People told me I was
out on a limb, that I couldn't last. They said I should look
for another job." Cone worked up to eighteen hours a day. She
taught classes. She recruited faculty. She even made sure the
classrooms were left clean for the high school students who
would return the next morning. "I can't say anything but good
about her," proclaimed Mary Denny , a long-time associate.
Cone's most enjoyable task was advising students. "Miss Cone
is one of the very choice people in college education work
because she takes such a personal interest in all of the
students," said Elmer Garinger .
Cone decided to fight to keep the Charlotte Center open
because of the educational opportunities the institution
provided for students who otherwise would have had little hope
of attending college. "I saw what was happening to the young
people," she explained. Governor James Holshouser summed up
Cone's achievements best at the time of her retirement. "Some
people devote their lives to building monuments to themselves.
She has devoted hers to building educational opportunities for
others."
Cone's first major victory came in 1949. She and her
supporters won permission from the North Carolina General
Assembly to continue the two-year college under the auspices of
the Charlotte public school system of which Garinger had just
become Superintendent. Named Charlotte College , the
institution ran on a shoestring. It operated with part-time
faculty in part-time classrooms and had to depend almost solely
upon student tuitions for its financial survival.
The man responsible for obtaining initial State funding in 1955
for Charlotte College and maybe as influential as Bonnie Cone
in the early history of the institution was W. A. Kennedy ,
nicknamed "Woody." Ken Sanford calls Kennedy the "spiritual
father of Charlotte College." Because he died in 1958 and
therefore like Moses on Mount Nebo could only look into the
"promised land" of the college's present suburban campus,
"Woody" Kennedy is largely forgotten.
A graduate of North Carolina State University and seller
of textile machinery, Kennedy was unswerving in his
determination to establish a State-supported institution of
higher education in Charlotte. Kennedy worked tirelessly, even
spending his own money to prepare and mail out questionnaires to
potential backers of the school. Kennedy left no stone
unturned in his search for money. If necessary, he and Bonnie
Cone would let it be a private institution. At one point he
approached Governor Cameron Morrison about giving money to the
school, which would then be renamed "Morrison College."
Morrison declined.
Sometimes Kennedy's rhetoric in support of a
State-supported four-year college for Charlotte became
strident. "For years Carolina and State have both tried to
throw us a sop or bone here in Charlotte in the nature of an
extension course in order to keep us quiet," he stated.
According to Kennedy, extension courses were not sufficient to
meet the educational needs of Charlotte and its environs. "1000
additional high school graduates would go to college each year
if they had the same opportunity or the same available
facilities as some other areas of the state," Kennedy
declared. Characterizing his critics as the same kind of nay
Sayers who had told leaders like the Oates Brothers and D. A.
Tompkins that Charlotte would never become a major textile
center, Kennedy called for a positive attitude on the subject of
making Charlotte College a four-year, State-supported
institution. "Do you believe in a timid or bold approach to
this problem?," he asked.
Except for the tenacity of Kennedy and Bonne Cone,
Charlotte College would never have moved beyond being a
two-year community college. "Miss Cone has provided the faith
on which the college many times found its primary ability to
exist," commented J. Murrey Atkins . "She has stuck with it and
never even thought of giving up when sometimes the sledding
seemed pretty hard." Support among the business executives of
Charlotte for the school was lukewarm at best. One influential
graduate of North Carolina State feared that putting a
state-supported college in Charlotte would harm his beloved alma
mater. "I would not be in favor of anything that would in any
way hinder the growth and prestige of 'dear old State,'" he
wrote. The writer was not alone in harboring such sentiments.
"Charlotte has never been short on pride," said the Charlotte
News on May 11, 1956, "but with the chips down, it
has often exhibited distressingly little interest in higher
education in the past."
Dramatic breakthroughs for Charlotte College did occur in
1957 and 1958. The school began holding its first day classes;
it acquired an independent Board of Trustees; local property tax
revenues in support of the school increased; and Charlotte
College secured options on land for its own campus. Several
sites were considered, including the Cameron Morrison Estate or
Morrocroft, the former Naval Ammunition Depot site in what is
now the Arrowood Industrial Park, a cleared site in the Second
Ward or Brooklyn neighborhood, and a 248-acre tract on Highway
49 northeast of Charlotte owned by Construction Brick and Tile
Company. On August 12, 1957, the Charlotte College Board of
Trustees voted to buy the Highway 49 property. Businessman
Oliver Rowe remembered going to the site with Bonnie Cone when
the only buildings on the land were a barn and a silo left from
earlier farming days. "She reached down and grasped a handful
of earth, let it sift through her fingers and said, 'This is the
place. This is the place.'"
 |
| The Groundbreaking Ceremony. J. Murrey
Atkins is on far right. Bonnie Cone has shovel in hand. |
Charlotte College moved to its suburban campus in 1961. The
first two buildings, one named for "Woody" Kennedy, were
designed by A. G. Odell, Jr ., the same man David Ovens had
selected to design Ovens Auditorium and the Charlotte Coliseum
on Independence Boulevard . Odell, the son of a wealthy
Concord textile family and graduate of Cornell University, was
Charlotte's best known and most prolific Modernist architect.
Upset that the Charlotte College buildings resembled those that
Odell was designing for St. Andrews College at Laurinburg, Cone
nonetheless pushed ahead with Odell's plans for the new campus.
A groundbreaking ceremony was held on November 21, 1960, and
classes opened the following September. On May 8, 1962, the
Board of Trustees voted to request the addition of the junior
year in 1963 and the senior year in 1964. The North Carolina
General Assembly did approve four-year, state-supported status
for Charlotte College in 1963.
|
 |
|
Oliver Rowe was among Ms. Cone's
staunchest supporters. A building on campus is named in
his honor. |
Bonnie
Cone was seemingly omnipresent on the Charlotte College Campus
in those early days. This writer, a brash twenty-five year old
historian at the time, joined the faculty in June 1963 and had
his first office in what had been the kitchen for the college
soda shop. The floor sloped down to a drain in the middle of
the room where countless fluids of countless types had once
descended into the unknown depths below. Bonnie Cone walked by
one day and saw the less than ideal environment in which this
writer worked. It might have reminded her of the Lost and Found
Room at Central High School . "I will not have a faculty
member of mine sit in a place like this," she proclaimed.
Carpenters arrived within an hour to rectify the situation.
Uppermost
in Cone's mind was making Charlotte College a campus of the
University of North Carolina system. "Few of the faculty and
staff recruited in 1963 and 1964 would have come to the brand
new four-year college without seeing through Cone's eyes the
university that was to unfold," says Ken Sanford. J. Murrey
Atkins , long-time chairman of the Charlotte College Board of
Trustees, would not live to see the dream's fulfillment. He
died on December 2, 1963. But Bonnie Cone persevered. Victory
came on March 2, 1965, when the General Assembly approved the
transformation of Charlotte College into the University of North
Carolina at Charlotte , effective July 1, 1965. Not since
Stephen Mattoon had raised the money to build Biddle Hall in
1883 had Charlotte witnessed such an astounding success in the
arena of higher education. A spontaneous celebration erupted on
campus when word reached Charlotte from Raleigh. "Miss Cone,
can you hear the victory bell ringing?," exclaimed her
secretary into the telephone.
Certainly, there were influential women in this community
before Bonnie Cone . Not the least among them was Gladys Avery
Tillett . Tillett labored tirelessly for the ratification of
the 19th Amendment in 1920, even using a handkerchief
embroidered "Votes for Women." She helped found the
Mecklenburg League of Women Voters and was an active Democrat
until her death in 1984.
It was in
the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s that substantial numbers of women
began to assume positions of political influence in Charlotte
and Mecklenburg County. "A lot of women became involved in
the political process in our community -- not just pouring the
tea and helping the guys, but getting out there themselves and
being in the forefront," remembered one member of the Women's
Political Caucus. "It was very exciting, the beginning of women
feeling they had some power, to be reckoned with, to be able to
speak in a voice," recalled another. In 1954, Martha Evans , an
exuberant redhead, became the first female member of the
Charlotte City Council. She twice ran for mayor, against James
Smith in 1959 and against Stan Brookshire and James Smith in
1961. Evans lost both times. In 1972, Myers Park resident
Elizabeth or "Liz" Hair won a seat on the Board of County
Commissioners and became chairperson of that body in 1974. A
founding member of the Charlotte Women's Political Caucus , Hair
was determined to advance issues that were especially important
to women. She was instrumental in establishing the Mecklenburg
County Women's Commission , the Council on Aging, and the
adoption of the county's first affirmative action plan. She was
responsible for the County's initial greenway master plan and
was pivotal in saving the historic First Baptist Church in 1977
as the home of Spirit Square .
Betty
Chafin, now Betty Chafin Rash , was also an early leader of the
Charlotte Women's Political Caucus . Born in Atlanta and reared
in Winston-Salem, Chafin came to Charlotte in 1965 and soon
started devoting much of her energy and talents to broadening
the base of political participation in this community. Elected
to City Council in 1975, she became a champion for ending the
totally at-large system of electing members to that body. It
had been that arrangement, enacted in 1917, that more than
anything else had assured that white males would dominate local
government. "Almost the whole council lived in one quadrant of
the city," declared one of Chafin's allies. "This whole
community was being governed by a slice of pie which if you'd
eaten it, you would've eaten up southeast Charlotte."
District
representation was the "product of no blue-ribbon committee,
Chamber task force or uptown bankroll," wrote Charlotte
Observer columnist Jim Morrill. It was the "result
of a small group of people who wanted to push more chairs around
the public table." Sam Smith , a computer software developer,
called it "as pure grass-roots an effort as you'll ever see."
Smith insisted that Charlotte's Westside was the "stepchild" of
the city and would never receive just treatment until it was
more adequately represented on City Council and on other elected
and appointed committees and agencies. Smith recruited other
Westsiders, including truck driver Marvin Smith , and leaders of
Charlotte's emerging neighborhood movement to back his efforts
Bill
McCoy of the Urban Institute at UNCC assisted Smith and his
supporters in developing a plan for having City Council consist
of seven district representatives and four at-large
representatives. John Belk , son of New South retailer William
Henry Belk , was mayor from 1969 until 1977. A millionaire,
Belk vigorously opposed district representation. On October
11, 1976, he took the unprecedented step of vetoing a resolution
calling for a referendum on the issue. Rash and the other three
members of City Council who had supported the initiative were
stunned. "All we wanted," explained City Councilman Neil
Williams , "was the chance to submit the proposal to the
people."
 |
|
Mayor John Belk opposed district
representation. |
According to Belk, a specific scheme had to be presented to the
voters. "Being for district representation is like being for
motherhood," he declared. "In my opinion, you've got to find
out who your mother is before you come out for motherhood."
Belk insisted that district representation was not a priority
issue. Wrangling over district boundaries, he argued, would take
inordinate amounts of time and would divert public attention
from the more urgent need to consolidate city and county
governments. "I think the main thing that needs to be worked
out is consolidation of the city and county," said Belk during
the debate on October 11th.
Much
like his father, Belk believed that corporate executives and
their lieutenants could provide the best government for all.
"When you've got a winning team," he maintained, "you ought to
leave it alone" Mayor Belk contended that "district
representation would impede growth of the city, create 'horse
trading' among council members and mean that the district
council members would not represent the city at large on some
issues," writes Alex Coffin in his book, Brookshire & Belk.
Sam
Smith and his allies overcame Belk's veto by gathering
thousands of names on petitions to force a referendum. "We won
in the face of a lot of power," said Smith. The voters of
Charlotte narrowly approved district representation for City
Council on April 19, 1977. Blacks broke their traditional
alliance with southeast Charlotte and sided instead with middle
class and lower middle class white precincts in west, north, and
east Charlotte and with neighborhoods such as Dilworth . A
reporter for the Charlotte Observer understood
the import of what had occurred. "When neighborhood groups in
north, west, and east Charlotte combined with a substantial
majority of black voters to pass district representation
Tuesday, they said goodbye to a long tradition in city
government -- the domination of City Hall by well-to-do business
leaders from southeast Charlotte."
The
establishment of district representation on City Council in 1977
and the eventual adoption of similar arrangements for the Board
of County Commissioners and the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School
Board in the 1980s sounded the death knell of the political
system that the New South leaders had established at the turn of
the last century. "The result," says Alex Coffin, "was that
fewer payroll-meeting businessmen -- or businesswomen -- were
elected thereafter." Not surprisingly, there was a concerted
effort by some business executives to abolish district
representation. In 1981, the citizens of Charlotte defeated that
initiative. They went to the polls and said "yes" to continuing
the new system by a margin of 11,023 votes. The days of
unrivaled political hegemony by Charlotte's business elite were
over.
 |
|
A. G. Odell, Jr. in an informal
moment |
The
architecture and urban design plans for Charlotte-Mecklenburg of
this era also reflected the profound changes that were occurring
in this community in the years immediately following World War
II. Especially noteworthy in this regard is the work of A. G.
Odell, Jr. A. G. Odell, Jr., the
flamboyant son of a Cabarrus County textile executive, studied
architecture at Cornell University and came to Charlotte in 1939
to establish a one-man office. By the time of his death in April
1988 Odell oversaw the operations of one of the largest and most
influential architectural businesses in North Carolina. "In a
society where class connection still counted for much, young
Odell had automatic entry to the offices of the area's mill
owners and businessmen," writes historian Thomas Hanchett. When
Odell arrived, Charlotte’s buildings were overwhelming
conservative and revivalist in appearance and had been so for
decades. "Most architecture in the area can best be described as
pseudo-neoclassical, with elements of design copied from
buildings elsewhere that had already incorporated copied
elements of classic design," remembered M. H. Ward, one of
Odell’s early associates. A. G. Odell, Jr. became Charlotte’s
principal champion of the International style and devoted his
considerable talents and energies to reshaping the local urban
landscape. For good or ill, he largely succeeded. Odell embraced
the architecture of "tomorrow" and had nothing but disdain for
the revivalist buildings he observed on the streets of
Charlotte.
One of Odell's earliest
surviving International style houses is the Robert and Elizabeth
Lassiter House at 726 Hempstead Place in Charlotte. Built in
1951 in the otherwise traditionalist Eastover neighborhood, the
Lassiter House exhibits the exuberant boldness one finds in
Odell's designs. A friend of attorney Robert Lassiter, Odell
worked closely with Lassiter's wife Elizabeth in developing
plans for the house. Steel beams support the roof and eliminate
the need for load-bearing interior walls, thereby enabling large
open spaces to predominate throughout the interior. A
particularly ingenious scheme was an arrangement whereby the
dining table could be set in the kitchen, complete with food and
adornments, and slid through the wall into the dining room,
where guests could witness the dramatic arrival of the entire
repast.
 |
|
Odell made special arrangements for
a built-in television. |
 |
|
The foyer of the Lassiter House is
walled in glass to allow light to penetrate the
interior. |
Another of
Odell's early home designs is the Goldstein House (1958) on
Merwick Circle. Fashioned by Albert Cameron, an architect in
Odell's firm, the house is modest in size but dramatic in
impact. The fundamentals of the
International style centered upon the exploitation of new
materials, especially reinforced concrete, strengthened steel,
and large expanses of glass, to create grace, airiness, and to
allow great amounts of sunlight to penetrate the interior of
structures.
The exposed rafters and lavish use of glass
are typical of the Modernist style.
It was in the area of urban design that A. G.
Odell, Jr. was to have his greatest impact upon Charlotte.
Odell took his lead from the
thinking of such revolutionary post-World War One European
architects as Le Corbusier. From about 1920 until shortly before
his death in 1965, Le Corbusier was an untiring proselytizer for
what he called the "Radiant City." To his way of thinking, urban
designers should break completely with the past. Le Corbusier
had no sympathy or interest in the preservation of existing
buildings or neighborhoods. "Modern town planning comes to birth
with a new architecture," he proclaimed. Le Corbusier envisioned
people living in high rise apartments surrounded by lustrous
skyscrapers separated from one another by large expanses of
manicured open space and dramatic fountains. Urban cores should
be hygienic, antiseptic, and ordered -- not cluttered, begrimed,
and haphazard. The tradition of mixing functions in a single
structure or neighborhood was an anathema to Corbusier. The city
of the future would be divided into discreet sections devoted to
specific purposes – working, living, leisure – connected to one
another by expressways.
 |
|
Le Corbusier |
In 1965-66
Odell and Associates developed a comprehensive plan for the
remaking of Center City Charlotte. It reflected his iconoclastic
philosophy and established the fundamental parameters of uptown
development for more than two decades. The plan continues to
have considerable impact today. The initial impetus for the
remaking of Center City Charlotte originated with the Downtown
Charlotte Association in the early 1960s. Convinced that the
urban core was spiraling downward in the face of growing
suburbanization, the Association hired Hammer & Associates,
economic consultants, in early 1963 to study what Center City
Charlotte needed. The Hammer Report determined that new stores,
green space, parking garages, and new entertainment facilities
were required. It was this report that induced the Downtown
Charlotte Association to hire A. G. Odell and Associates in 1965
to devise the Center City Plan, which was officially released in
September 1966.
|
 |
|
A. G. Odell,
Jr. |
Odell
benefited from the temper of his times. The 1960s and 1970s in
Charlotte-Mecklenburg and the United States as a whole were
decades of buoyant optimism, the persisting unpopularity of the
Vietnam War notwithstanding. An eagerness to greet the
challenges of the future and an almost total rejection of
history and its architecture dominated elitist thinking. In a
speech to the Charlotte Civitan Club’s 1966 Distinguished
Citizens Award Ceremony, Dr. John T. Caldwell, Chancellor of
North Carolina State University, advanced the commonly held
assumption of that day that focusing upon the past was
counterproductive to "progress." Charlotte "is a community
filled with optimism for the days head, or it is a city enjoying
a past that probably never was," he declared. Caldwell
continued: "Charlotte is a city which is captive to the mores
and fears of the past, or it is a community which greets the new
demands of contemporary America with resilience at least and
with eagerness at best."
The
Charlotte Observer sounded a similar tone. The newspaper was
a consistent champion of the growth and expansion of Charlotte
and its environs. Predictably, it issued a call for aggressive
implementation of Odell’s Center City Plan when it was presented
to the Charlotte City Council in March 1966. The editorial page
contended that "Charlotte . . . has been studied enough. Those
concerned about making this a more functional, more attractive
city will now begin to act." The Charlotte Observer
chided City leaders again in July 1966 for their alleged record
of sluggishness in moving ahead with daring innovations. "Past
councils have been much too reluctant to act with boldness and
determination in redevelopment," the newspaper proclaimed.
On March 2,
1966, James Rouse, the visionary developer of the planned
community of Columbia, Md., trumpeted the same message in a
stirring address he gave to attendees at the first annual UNCC
Forum. He argued that unless Charlotte acted quickly and boldly
it could squander its chances for becoming "one of the country’s
most glorious cities." According to Rouse, the people of
Charlotte stood "on the threshold of opportunity." To step back
from the challenge, he insisted, would propel Charlotte in the
wrong direction. "You can also succeed in reaching the point
where the big, ugly cities are now. And you will surely get
there if you don’t plan with boldness and vision," Rouse
maintained. Not surprisingly, the Charlotte Observer
rushed to endorse Rouse’s remarks. "Charlotte, as the major city
of the Carolinas, can plan, can grow in an orderly manner, can
become a city of the future," the editors declared. "But its
citizens will have to have their minds stretched again and
again."
Odell’s
Center City Plan was bold and visionary. Voters had approved a
bond referendum the previous year to fund street improvements in
the Center City; and the leveling of virtually every structure
in the Second Ward or "Brooklyn" neighborhood, a large African
American enclave, was already proceeding apace.15
Building upon these initiatives, Odell proposed a series of
audacious initiatives. Like Le Corbusier, Odell embraced the
philosophy of the "Radiant City." His plan predicted that
visitors would "be coming to a new Charlotte, a Charlotte built
anew with imagination, with sound economic reasoning, with a
full knowledge that Charlotte’s position of leadership in the
Carolinas and in the Southeast is one which the city deserves."16
What the Charlotte Observer called "swaths of expressway
construction" would enable suburbanites to drive their
automobiles more easily to the urban core.17
Parking decks would be built to house all the additional cars
coming to the Center City, and all curbside parking would be
eliminated. The intersection of Trade and Tryon Sts. would be
transformed into a true "Square" by creating a plaza at the
southeastern corner bordered by a hotel and retail shops.
Odell, much in the
tradition of the International style, advocated the creation of
residential districts defined by parks and high rise apartment
buildings. The plan called for the destruction of all the older
homes in Fourth Ward, which the Charlotte Observer termed
a "slum." Edwin Towers, a high rise apartment building for the
elderly, was then under construction and apparently was the type
of structure Odell envisioned for much of Fourth Ward. The plan
advocated the burial of all utility lines and the removal of the
railroad tracks between College and Brevard Streets and the
turning of the rail line into a "Convention Boulevard."
The most
crucial element of Odell’s Center City Plan, what the
Charlotte Observer called its "spark," was the construction
of a Convention Center at the corner of South College St. and
East Trade St. John A. Tate, Jr.,
Chairman of the Committee for the Master Plan, underscored the
urgency of proceeding with the building when he spoke to the
Charlotte Rotary Club on June 14, 1966. "The convention center
is the ‘heart’ of the master plan for downtown revitalization,"
Tate insisted. "It is the ‘trigger’ and the ‘stimulant’ for
redevelopment of the first block of South Tryon Street."
The story of
how the Convention Center got built is a tortuous and twisted
tale The schedule for erecting the Convention Center was
sidetracked on several occasions, but the City finally began
constructing the facility in October 1971. "We’re concerned that
this building will have a character of its own that will
symbolize Charlotte in the eyes of the nation," said A. G.
Odell. Odell promised that the Charlotte Civic Center, as it
became called, "will compare with any in the country." The building opened with great fanfare on September 9,
1973. Ironically, the Charlotte Civic Center, which has been
replaced by a new, larger convention center, stands empty today;
and its future is in great jeopardy.
In this
writer’s opinion, the 1973 Charlotte Civic Center demonstrates a
major weakness of the International style. The building’s most
distinctive features are large pyramidal skylights that are only
visible from a perspective several hundred feet in the air.
While perhaps impressive as part of an architectural model, the
Charlotte Civic Center presents blank brick walls to the
pedestrian and provides no vitality or life to the streetscape.
This criticism in no way detracts from the historic importance
of the building, however. The Charlotte Civic Center did
stimulate large-scale real estate developments on adjacent
parcels, specifically the North Carolina National Bank Complex
and the Radisson Hotel. The building was also the most crucial
element in the implementation of A. G. Odell Jr.’s seminal 1966
Charlotte Center City Plan.
The other leading
proponent of Modernist architecture in Charlotte was J. N. Pease
Associates. In the early 1960s, the editors and production
staff of the Charlotte Observer saw the need to expand
the newspaper’s home so that more presses could be brought on
line and more space could be provided for its various
departments to keep up with growing circulation. General Manager
Bill Dowd considered several sites, including suburban tracts
off Interstate 85; but he and publisher Jim Knight preferred
locations in the Center City. "Dowd feared that the newspapers’
move to the suburbs at that juncture would cripple downtown,"
writes Jack Claiborne in his history of the Charlotte
Observer. It is not surprising that the Observer wanted a
contemporary, non-traditional style building for its home, since
the newspaper had consistently championed Charlotte as a
"progressive place."
 |
|
This is the J. N. Pease Company's
drawing of the building. |
Real Estate agent Louis
Rose succeeded in assembling the entire block surrounding the
building the Charlotte Observer had occupied at the
corner of South Tryon St. and W. Stonewall St. since 1927. Dowd
made the announcement in December 1965 that the Charlotte
Observer would not move to the suburbs but would construct a
new building on the tract that Rose had put together. "We are
particularly pleased," he proclaimed, "that our newspapers are
to remain in downtown Charlotte, and we are hopeful that the
developments we have in mind will be an enhancement of downtown
and a stimulus to plans for revitalizing the central business
district." The Charlotte Observer moved into its new
Center City home in 1972.
J. N. Pease Associates, a
Charlotte-based design and engineering firm, was the architect
of the new Charlotte Observer Building. J. Norman Pease, a
native of Columbus, Ga., and James A. Stenhouse, born in St.
Louis, Mo. but a resident of Charlotte from early childhood,
co-founded their company in 1938. The building of Fort Bragg and
the hiring of J. N. Pease Associates to provide architectural
and engineering services for the massive military base gave a
great boost to the firm. The success of J. N. Pease Associates
continued after World War Two as Stenhouse and Pease competed
successfully for major projects, including the new home of the
Charlotte Observer. Commenting on Pease’s career, the
Charlotte Observer stated: "So sweeping was his
presence, most Charlotte residents have probably worked in,
banked in, studied or prayed in one of his products." J. N.
Pease Associates, in addition to many other projects, designed
Edwin Towers in Fourth Ward, most of the buildings at Central
Piedmont Community College, developed a master plan for the
expansion of the government center in Center City Charlotte and
fashioned most of the buildings and spaces created therein,
including Marshall Park.
|
 |
|
J. N. Pease |
Pease, who had moved to
Charlotte in 1920 to open an office for Lockwood Green, an
engineering firm, was an engineer, not an architect. He believed
that by offering a wide range of services, including having its
own structural, electrical, and mechanical engineers, J. N.
Pease Associates could win contracts to design and oversee the
construction of municipal facilities, such as governmental
office buildings, sanitary plants and water treatment works for
cities. Pease was also eager to provide design and engineering
services for clients in the private sector.
Not surprisingly,
especially in the post-World War Two years, J. N. Pease
Associates became an advocate of the Modernist style. The School
of Design at North Carolina State championed Modernism after the
arrival of Henry Kamphoefner as dean in 1948, and many of its
graduates joined firms like J. N. Pease. Also, as noted earlier,
A. G. Odell, Jr. had established his office in Charlotte in 1939
and had become an ardent advocate of Modernism. A final
factor in inducing J. N. Pease Associates to embrace Modernism
was the influence of J. Norman Pease, Jr. Trained in Modernist
principles at Auburn University, the younger Pease joined his
father’s firm after World War Two and replaced Beaux
Arts-trained James Stenhouse as chief designer.
 |
|
J. N. Pease Associates
developed this plan for the government center in 1966.
It demonstrates the commitment of the firm to the
concepts of the "Radiant City." It does retain the
original Charlotte City Hall, the Mecklenburg County
Courthouse, and the Law Building (since destroyed), but
the overall thrust is toward high rise and mid-rise
buildings in a manicured landscape. |
According to Claiborne,
the design of the Charlotte Observer Building was inspired by
the headquarters of the Miami Herald, then the home
newspaper of the Knight Publishing Company. The intent was to
erect an "imposing castle," a structure that would communicate
to the public the importance of the Charlotte Observer to
the community and the region. The influence of Modernism upon
the design is obvious. In keeping with Swiss architect Le
Corbusier’s notion of the "Radiant City," which J. Norman Pease,
Jr. had studied at Auburn along with the ideas of such exponents
of Modernism as Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius, the
building is devoid of lavish decoration, uses its essential form
and the employment of contemporary materials to convey its
significance, and is surrounded by a manicured lawn and
landscaping.
 |