Cedar Grove and Hugh Torrance House and Store
Cedar Grove House
Hugh Torance House and Store
This report was written on 22 April 1993
1. Name and location of the properties: The properties known as
Cedar Grove and the Hugh Torrance House and Store are located on Gilead
Road, Huntersville, in Mecklenburg County , North Carolina.
2. Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner of the
properties: The owners of the properties are:
Mr. and Mrs. Richard Torrance Banks
PO Box 122
8229 Gilead Rd.
Huntersville, North Carolina 28078
Telephone: 704 /875-0774
3. Representative photographs of the properties: This report
contains representative photographs of the properties.
4. Maps depicting the locations of the properties: This report
contains maps which depict the locations of the properties.
5. Current deed book references to the properties: Cedar Grove Tax
Parcel Number 009-061-01 is not listed in the Mecklenburg County deed books.
The most recent reference to the second Cedar Grove property, Tax Parcel
Number 015-091-04, is listed in Mecklenburg County Will Book W23 at page 77.
The most recent reference to Cedar Grove Tax Parcel Number 009-061-07 is
listed in Mecklenburg County Will Book W23 at page 77. The most recent
reference to the Hugh Torrance House and Store, Tax Parcel Number
009-061-09, is listed in Mecklenburg County Will Book W23 at page 77.
6. A brief historical sketch of the properties: This report
contains a brief historical sketch of the properties prepared by Ms. Paula
7. A brief architectural description of the properties: This
report contains a brief architectural description of the properties prepared
by Ms. Frances Alexander.
8. Documentation of why and in what ways the properties meet criteria
for designation set forth in NCGS 160A-400.5:
a. Special significance in terms of history, architecture, and
cultural importance: The Commission judges that the properties known
as Cedar Grove and the Hugh Torrance House and Store do possess special
significance in terms of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County. The Commission
bases its judgment on the following Considerations: 1) the Hugh Torrance
House and Store was built between 1780 and the early 1800s, and Cedar
Grove was constructed between 1831 and 1833; 2) the Hugh Torrance House
and Store is one of the few houses to survive from the eighteenth century
settlement period of the county; 3) Cedar Grove is one of the premier
Greek Revival houses remaining in the county and the Piedmont; 4) because
of their physical and historical associations, these two properties offer
a unique picture of agricultural life in Mecklenburg County from the
settlement period through the antebellum era; 5) the two houses, and their
various construction campaigns, illustrate clearly the evolution of
residential architecture in the county during early periods, for which
little remains; 6) both houses are remarkably intact, retaining important
characteristic interior and exterior features, including original floor
plans, decorative elements, hardware, and woodwork.
b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling,
and association: The Commission contends that the architectural
descriptions by Ms. Frances P. Alexander included in this report
demonstrate that Cedar Grove and the Hugh Torrance House and Store meet
9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The commission is aware that
designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50%
of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the properties which become
designated historic landmarks. The current appraised value of the
improvements to Cedar Grove is $144,600. The current appraised value of the
improvements to the Hugh Torrance House and Store is $6,880. The current
appraised value of Cedar Grove Tax Parcel 015-091-04 is $54,750. The current
appraised value of Cedar Grove Tax Parcel 009-061-01 is $193,160. The
current appraised value of Cedar Grove Tax Parcel 009-061-07 is $86,880. The
total appraised value of the three parcels of the Cedar Grove property is
$479,390. The current appraised value of the Hugh Torrance House and Store,
Tax Parcel 009-061-09, is $15,000. The total appraised value of the Hugh
Torrance House and Store property is $21,880. Tax Parcel Numbers 009-061-01
and 00906109 are zoned RU. Tax Parcel Number 009-061-07 and Tax Parcel
Number 015-091-04 are zoned R3.
Date of preparation of this report: 22 April 1993
Prepared by: Dr. Dan L. Morrill
in conjunction with
Ms. Frances P. Alexander
and Ms. Paula M. Stathakis
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission
P.O. Box 35434
Charlotte, North Carolina
Telephone: 704 /376-9115
Cedar Grove and the Hugh Torrance House and Store were one part of a
large financial concern owned and managed by the Torrance family. The first
member of this family in Mecklenburg County was Hugh Torance, who came to
the area in the late eighteenth century. Hugh and his son James accumulated
a substantial tract of land and by 1840 owned over one hundred slaves; a
concentration of wealth that was not common for this area. Although some
plantations thrived in Mecklenburg in the nineteenth century, the more
common enterprise for the region was small, and usually subsistence farming.
Planters commonly defined as those who owned twenty or more slaves were more
prevalent in Eastern North Carolina, in Virginia, in the South Carolina low
country, and in the black belt regions of Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi.
Hugh Torance (1743-1816) emigrated to the American colonies from Ireland
c. 1763. 1 A letter written by his minister in Five Mile Town in
the Parish of Clogher and County Tyrone vouched that "Hugh Torance is an
unmarried person and descended from honest and reputable parents and from
infancy lived in ye bounds of the Protestant Dissenting Congregation of this
place and always behaved himself orderly and supported a very fair church is
certified by Thomas Boyle (?) D.D." 2 It is not known what ship
brought Hugh Torance to America, or where he first landed. It is known that
he and his brother Albert came together, and the family believes that they
came as indentured servants. Hugh lived in Pennsylvania for several years.
Shortly after the outbreak of the American Revolution, Hugh took an oath of
allegiance to the General Assembly of Pennsylvania. 3
Hugh joined the revolutionary forces and fought in North Carolina in a
light cavalry company, the "Partisan Chargers" led by Captain Galbraith
Falls who was killed on June 20, 1780 at the Battle of Ramsour's Mill.
4 Records show that Hugh was a disbursing agent for Falls' militia and
probably stayed in the army until 1781. 5
After the war, Hugh married Captain Falls' widow, Isabella Kerr Falls
(1783-1816). He and Isabella and her eight children lived briefly in Rowan
County where Hugh had a store. They had one child together, James Galbraith
According to land records, Hugh Torance was active in Mecklenburg County
by 1779. He purchased 667 acres in that year, and by the 1790s, was in a
position to purchase over 500 acres during the course of the decade. By the
time of his death he had accumulated over 1400 acres. 6 In Rowan
County, Hugh was a merchant, but he became a planter in Mecklenburg. The
building currently designated as the Torrance House and Store is the first
of two structures Hugh built to accommodate his family.
The inventory of Hugh Torance's estate shows that he owned a substantial
amount of livestock: sixty cows, twelve horses, forty-six sheep, and 150
hogs, as well as their offspring . In terms of real and personal property,
Hugh Torance owned 1400 acres, thirty-three slaves. The estate had $1500.00
cash on hand. 7
Hugh's youngest son James acquired all of the property in Mecklenburg
County and focused most of his financial interests in a dry goods store that
he opened in 1805. James purchased most of his initial inventory from
merchants in Philadelphia. According to the recipts from his first buying
trip in May and June, 1805, James spent nearly $4000.00 to purchase ribbons,
cloths, buttons, dishes, jugs, tools, kettles, shovels, curry combs, rat
traps and hardware. 8
Torrence suplied articles to his North Mecklenburg customers that they
could not manufacture themselves, which suggests that the majority of his
patrons concentrated in agricultural production. James Torrence extended
credit for his customers for periods ranging from one day to one month.
9 His customers frequently paid him in cotton or sometimes in land.
Cash was usually used as a method of partial payment. Sometimes customers
traded in other commodities such as lard or powder in exchange for
merchandise. 10 During this time cash would have been scarce for
most of Torrence's middling neighbors. Economic relations based on barter
and exchange indicate that the area was not connected with a market economy
during the period that Torrence owned his store, and probably was not for a
significant period afterward. 11
Torrence sold the store in 1825 to Samuel McCombs of Charlotte; according
to family legend, his daughters convniced him that it was beneath a man of
his stature to engage in trade. Besides his store, James also ran a large
plantation with a saw mill on site. During James' life, the Torrence
plantation expanded to approximately 3000 acres. 12 James grew
primarily cotton and corn, but also grew the provisions and livestock
necessary to maintain a large plantation.
Plantations were rare in Mecklenburg and seem to have been concentrated
in the northwestern section of the county. Other substantial landowners in
the vicinity were the Lattas, the McDowells, the Davidsons, and the
Alexanders. Slave holding was common in Mecklenburg County, but the
Torrences and their landed peers frequently owned thirty or more slaves,
which was an exceptional number for this area. 13
Unfortunately, very little information about the Torrence family slaves
survives in the family papers. A notebook titled "Ages of Negroes" is the
only surviving inventory of the slave population on the Torrence Plantation.
According to this notebook, James Torrence owned 125 slaves, excluding two
who were marked as dead and three who were struck from the lists. 14
The Torrence slaves sometimes shopped at local merchants using Torrence's
account for dry goods. Invoices from Andrew Springs show that slaves had
purchased calico, buttons, shoes, bonnets, suspenders, tin cups, coffee,
sugar and turpentine. 15
The Torrence family seldom mentioned their slaves in their
correspondence. In the surviving records, James Torrence makes no personal
notes regarding his slaves; he only mentions them in the 1840 inventory, and
in his will, as some slaves were given to his children. His son Hugh alluded
to a problem slave in a letter to his father in 1838: "I have a negro in the
woods he may attempt to go back though I cannot tell. It is Dick. I
undertook to whip him a few days ago and when I called him up - he took to
the woods. He is a great rascal. If I ever get him, I will sell him -- for I
believe he will spoil every negro we have if I keep him." 16
James' twelve year old daughter Jane Elizabeth writing from Salem Female
Academy in 1835 closed her letter by asking her father to "Tell the black
people howdy for me." 17 During the Civil War, James Torrances'
widow Margaret wrote to her son Richard that her "darkeys are doing very
well. Some of the negroes in this quarter have left their masters to try the
There is no complete record of overseers, and no record of there being
one before 1849. It appears that from 1849-1851 a new overseer was hired
every year. 19 This kind of turnover was not unusual. Planters
dismissed overseers for a range of different reasons: leniency or cruelty to
slaves, drunkenness, and failure to make a good crop. 20 In 1862,
Margaret Torrance, James Torrance's widow, hired James Brown to oversee the
plantation. Brown stayed with the family until 1865. The contract between
James Brown and Margaret Torrance illustrates the usual responsibilities of
overseers. Brown agreed to enforce eighteen provisions in exchange for
$210.00, and the use of a milk cow and a horse.
Brown's primary responsibilities involved monitoring the slaves' work and
protecting the Torrance's property. Slaves were to begin their day early
enough to feed the stock and prepare their own breakfast. Brown was to
follow the slaves to their work to make sure that they went on task. Slaves
stayed at work until sundown. In the summer, field hands received a two hour
break at midday, and one hour in the fall and spring. The slave cabins were
inspected at least once a week at night "to keep the negroes from running
about", and no one was allowed out of their cabin without permission. On
Saturday evenings, women were allowed to spend two hours to wash their
laundry and all hands were expected to appear on Monday mornings with "comb
head and clean clothes unless prevented by circumstances." Brown was also
responsible for the maintenance and health of livestock. He supervised
gearing horses and had to account for the condition of gear, wagons and
The primary role of slaves on the Torrance Plantation was to produce
cotton. There are no complete records of cotton production, but some
indication of the plantations cotton output exists in the receipts of cotton
sales from 1816-1846. In 1816, cotton gins could press between 285-325
pounds of cotton. A receipt form a Charleston broker indicates that, in June
1816, cotton sold between 30 cents per pound to 22 cents per pound for an
inferior grade. Thus in one exchange on June 22, 1816, James Torrance made
$94.69 from three bales (after paying hauling and storage charges to the
broker). The price of cotton declined steadily during the 1820s and 1830s.
In order to continue to make a profit, Torrance had to focus on growing more
cotton and had to take more cotton to market at a time to make the trip
worth his while. Torrance usually traded with cotton brokers in Charleston,
Fayetteville, and Columbia. By 1843, Torrance's receipts show that the price
of cotton had plunged to five and a quarter cents per pound. In May 1843,
Torrance sold 150 bales weighing 54,055 pounds an average of 360 pounds per
bale at five and a quarter cents per pound to make $2325.40. In 1827 when
Torrance was paid nine cents per pound, he could make $2000.00 from 69
bales. Towards the end of his life, cotton prices rose slightly, but the
latest receipt in his files, from 1846 shows that he did not make more than
nine and three eights cents per pound. 22
In addition to cotton, James Torrance also raised sheep for wool. Other
major crops included corn and wheat. He built a water-powered saw mill and
grist mill in 1824. He sawed lumber for himself and his neighbors. 23
The Torrance Plantation supported a large number of people. James
Torrance had a big family as well as over one hundred slaves. Torrance was
married three times. He married his first wife, Nancy Davidson, in 1809.
Nancy was the daughter of Ephraim and Jane Brevard Davidson of Mount Mourne
(a plantation that was formerly in Mecklenburg County, but is now in Iredell
County). James and Nancy had five children: Jane Adeline (1811-1820),
Catherine Camilla (b. 1814), Isabella Malvina (1818-1893), Hugh Jr., and
James Franklin (1816-1869). Nancy Davidson Torrence died of "typhus" in 1818
at the age of 26. 24
James Torrance remarried in 1821 to Mary Latta, daughter of James and
Jane Latta of Hopewell. 25 James had two children with Mary Latta:
William Latta (1822-1852) and Jane Elizabeth (1823-1844). Mary Latta
Torrence died in 1824.
In 1827, James Torrence married for the third and final time. Margaret
Allison was the daughter of Richard and Letitia Neil Allison of Statesville.
Margaret and James had six children: Letitia (b. 1828), Mary (b. 1829),
Delia (b. 1831). Richard (1833-1927), Sarah Jane (b. 1826), and John
(1839-1904). Margaret Torrance died in 1880, surviving her husband by
Cedar Grove, the extant plantation house currently occupied by Richard
Allison Torrance's grandson, Richard Banks, was built by James Torrance in
1831 for Margaret Torrance. Cedar Grove was built on the same site as a
brick house built by Hugh Torance in 1784. Much of the lumber for Cedar
Grove was processed on site by James Torrance's saw mill. The bricks for the
house were also made on site. Brick making was directed by master mason V.
Rivafavoli. According to James Torrance's account book kept during the
construction of Cedar Grove, Rivafavoli and a crew of slaves made 12,000
bricks between October 3, 1830 and May 5, 1831. In total, Rivafavoli made
over 20,000 bricks. 26
The master builders and carpenters for the house were David Hampton and
Jacob Shuman. The staircase is said to show the influence of the Stirewalt
style. Stirewalt was a master builder in Rowan County, and Hampton and
Shuman may have apprenticed with him. The stairs are made of walnut and are
the only part of the house that was not built from material that was
gathered and processed on site. Most of the hardware in the house came from
Philadelphia as did most of the original furniture. 27
By the time Cedar Grove was completed, most of the children from James
Torrance's first marriage had moved away. James Franklin, Hugh Jr., and
Isabella and her husband Frank Smith moved to plantations in Mississippi by
1837. The other surviving child from his first marriage, Catherine Camilla,
married William A. Latta of York County, SC.
Several letters survive from Hugh Jr., James Franklin, and Isabella that
describe their lives in the Mississippi wilderness. By the 1830s, many
planters moved westward in search of more fertile farmland. Torrance's
children established cotton plantations in Coffeeville, Mississippi. It was
the steady westward expansion of plantation agriculture based on slave labor
that ultimately ignited the political debate over free and slave territories
that set the nation on the course toward the Civil War.
Coffeeville, Mississippi was a world away from Cedar Grove. The Torrance
children exchanged an established plantation lifestyle for log cabins arid
rough society. Isabella wrote to her sister Camilla that her new home was a
cabin with so many cracks in the walls that the wind blew through them
constantly. James Franklin commented that Mississippi was relatively
uncivilized: "the people here are particularly fond of using the Bowye knife
and fire arms- not less than four or five cases have occurred in this county
since we got here in most of which sum man has lost his life." 28
Although the soil in Mississippi was better-suited for cotton agriculture
than in Mecklenburg County, James Torrance's eldest sons had a difficult
time establishing themselves on their new plantations. In the spring of
1838, Hugh Jr. wrote to his father that in the previous year he had raised
thirty one (480 pound) bales of cotton and 4000 bushels of corn. At that
time, prospects for the Torrances looked good as Hugh Jr. wrote to his
father that Mississippi land would entice him away from Cedar Grove, "I
think that you would be tempted to leave your clay hills - I am convinced
that your negroes would make you more here in one year after the first than
you can make there in three. Our land will produce 1000-1500 pounds of
cotton to the acre a hand can work eight acres and will bring about 1200
pounds if well worked." 29
In spite of these advantages, Mississippi was a hard place to make a
living. James Franklin and Hugh Jr. managed to make large cotton crops, but
they found that it was frequently difficult to get the cotton to market.
They depended largely on river transport to take the crop to market, but,
the river was often too low for them to move the cotton out or to take it
very far. 30 It was preferable to get the crop to New Orleans for
the best price. Unfortunately, there were no railroad lines in Mississippi
until 1850, and none that ran near Coffeeville until 1860. Cotton had to be
hauled by wagon to market, an expensive and difficult undertaking. The
Torrences frequently had to sell their cotton in Mississippi which meant
they were paid in Mississippi currency. Mississippi money was worthless out
of the state, and James Franklin estimated that it was worth 10%-20% less
than North Carolina currency. The death of the National Bank in 1833 and the
absence of bank regulation contributed to the financial troubles the
The Torrence boys' financial problems were compounded by the fact that
they owed debts in Mecklenburg County and were unable to pay them with
Mississippi currency. They were forced to ask their father to carry these
debts for them, which James Torrance did, in addition to his own debts.
Although James and Hugh's cotton crop was enormous, especially compared to
what their father was able to produce, the enthusiasm of their early letters
quickly waned and changed to laments that they were unable to make a profit.
Isabella wrote in 1840 that "Times are very hard here indeed." Cotton sold
for four cents a pound, and many of their neighbors had lost their
Isabella Torrence Smith probably suffered the most in Mississippi. Her
husband, Frank Smith, died shortly after they moved there, leaving Isabella,
their infant daughter, and a few slaves to manage a new plantation alone. At
the time of Frank Smiths death, Isabella's brother Hugh Jr. wrote to his
father that she was nearly four thousand dollars in debt. At first, it seems
that Isabella was determined to stay in Mississippi with her brothers, and
at least make enough to satisfy her creditors. However, most of her letters
home indicate that she preferred to return to Cedar Grove. She encountered
the same financial difficulties as her brothers, and could not afford to
return. Hugh Jr. urged his father to come for Isabella because she was
lonely in Mississippi. 32 Isabella returned to Mecklenburg County
in 1840. She married Rufus Reid, a neighboring planter and family friend,
and they had six children. 33
Nothing in Isabella's upbringing prepared her for life in the Mississippi
wilderness. She described a camp meeting to her father as a disorderly, loud
and unrefined affair, like everything else in the state. 34 She
and her sister Camilla were raised in the relatively refined society of
northern Mecklenburg County. They were sent to Salem Female Academy in
Salem, N. Carolina, and Camilla also studied at Lucretia Sarazen's School in
Philadelphia. From girlhood, they were trained to think and behave according
to the standards of their social station. Camilla moved within the same
circles in Yorkville, South Carolina. Isabella's log cabin on her
Coffeeville plantation, in an unsettled area that relied on camp meetings as
it had no established church proved to be territory for which Isabella was
Salem Academy was established in 1802 by the Moravian community and was
the first boarding school for girls in North Carolina. 35 At
Salem Female Academy, Torrances' daughters were instructed in the curriculum
approved for young ladies: grammar, geography, history, drawing, embroidery,
sewing, and music. Competency in these subjects prepared the daughters of
the elite for their roles as plantation mistresses for whom basic knowledge
was as important as the fine arts.
Letters from James Torrance's daughter Jane suggest that music was her
favorite subject. In all of her surviving letters from school, she never
fails to mention which pieces she has learned for recitals. Like all
students away from home she also never failed to ask for more pocket money.
The effects of the school on her social maturation and refinement are
evident in her letters to her father over the course of three years. At
eleven she wrote about the teeth she had to have pulled, and in the next
paragraph requested that her parents send her a box of cakes, locks of their
hair, and money. Within a few years, her letters assumed the tone of a young
lady of privilege asking her father to "Give my love to all my dear
acquaintances and friends when you see them. I remain your affectionate and
dutiful daughter until death." 36
Before the Torrance children were sent away to school, they were tutored
at home. The community would sometimes hire a tutor and give him lodging and
a school house as part of his salary to instruct the young boys of the area.
Young girls were usually tutored in their homes. 37 William Latta
Torrence was the first of James Torrance's sons to have access to college.
He was one of the first students at Davidson College and later attended the
University of Pennsylvania Medical School. James Torrance was one of the
initial subscribers to Davidson College. 38
Richard Allison Torrance, a son from James Torrance's third marriage, was
tutored as a child by Peter Stuart Ney. Ney is alleged by some to have been
Napoleon's field marshal Michel Ney. Although there is no evidence to
support this claim, this romantic belief in Ney's origins has been
sustained. Ney taught at a school in Mineral Springs. A notebook belonging
to Richard Torrance while he was a student of Ney's in 1844 survives in the
family papers. This notebook, kept when Richard was eleven years old, is
primarily an exercise book for spelling and writing. Richard Torrance copied
lines written by Ney such as " Practice writing Richard Torrance; Rich men
should be kind to poor men; Command your hand and pen Richard; Take more
Pains or you will have no gains; Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom."
Ney's elaborate and beautiful penmanship is followed by the scrawled lines
of the young boy's effort. 39
Richard Torrance completed his studies at the University of North
Carolina. Little is known of his academic life there, but Richard spent
considerable time trying to impress young women. On two occasions, Richard
hired George Moses Horton to compose flattering acrostics to the current
girl of his dreams. Horton was a slave who had taught himself to read and
write, and had a talent for poetry. He earned extra money by composing love
poems on demand for Chapel Hill students and eventually published three
books of verse. Horton charged twenty-five to fifty cents to students to
compose acrostics for their sweethearts. Hortons popularity quickly grew to
the point that he was able to parley his talent into a cottage industry. In
his biography, he wrote that "I have composed love pieces in verse for
courtiers from all parts of the state and acrostics on the names of the
tip-top belles of Virginia, South Carolina, and Georgia." Richard Torrance
commissioned two acrostics from Horton. "Inimitable Beauty" was composed for
Sophia Alexander, daughter of a wealthy Mecklenburg County planter who was
not swayed by this token and married John Sample of Tennessee instead.
Another acrostic was sent to a Mary McClean in an unsuccessful attempt to
win her affection. 40
Little is known about Margaret Allison Torrance, even though she became
mother to all of James Torrance's children and lived until 1880.
Considerable historical inquiry has been made regarding the role of the
plantation mistress, but Margaret Torrance did not leave journals or records
behind except a few letters that give any insight into her life. 41
Current scholarship shows that plantation women assumed several different
roles. As ladies, they were expected to be beautiful, refined, genteel, and
versed in poetry and music. As managers of the plantation household, they
had to clothe and manage the slaves, nurse the sick, supervise butchering
and personally prepare and cure meat, and run the plantation in the absence
of their husbands. After the death of James G. Torrance in 1847, Margaret
Torrance managed Cedar Grove until her death (after the Civil War, her son
John assisted her).
Richard Torrance married Bettie E. Reid, daughter of Rufus and Betsy
Latta Davidson Reid, on November 26, 1856. He moved to Texas where he
purchased land on the Brazos River in Fort Bend County, and Bettie stayed
behind at Cedar Grove. Richard Torrance's 1860 property assessment shows
that he owned 640 acres, nineteen slaves and livestock valued at $27,000.00.
The separation was difficult for Bettie Torrance. In a letter to her son,
Margaret Torrance reminded him that Bettie was very lonely at Cedar Grove,
but she did not believe that Bettie would be happy in Texas. 43
Bettie eventually moved to Texas to join her husband, and shortly after she
arrived, contracted a fever and died in September 1861, leaving him with two
Both Richard and John Torrance served in the Confederate forces during
the Civil War. At first, many Southerners hailed the War with great
enthusiasm. Margaret Torrance was no exception when she wrote to Richard in
1861 that as of July, there were no close Torrance relations in service,
but, "...nearly all of our most respectable neighbors have friends in the
fields batteling for our rights. We may say that the flowre of our land are
in the army. All the lower class are hanging back, nothing short of a draft
will bring them into service." 44 In October, 1861, John Torrance
wrote to his brother "I have joined that army expect to leave home in a few
days, probably never to return. I hope and trust I may, if I fall you must
come and take care of those left behind." 45 Richard Torrance
joined the service shortly afterward with Terry's Eighth Texas Rangers, a
cavalry company that fought under Nathan Bedford Forrest.
Any enthusiasm the Torrance family had for the war definitely waned
within the year. Margaret Torrance, faced with the harsh reality of having
two sons in the army wrote to Richard in 1862, "Oh how often I think of you
and John, when I get down to eat, particularly. I can have my tabal groaning
and plenty to spare and think of my dear boyes, faring so scantily. It
brings the tears to my cheek while writing. And now I do not know if you are
in the land of the living or not." She continued that she had recently read
about the engagement of the Texas Rangers at Murfreesboro and the heavy
Confederate losses there, "I can not help feeling like it was uncertain,
whether I am writing to the living or the dead." She could not know at the
time she wrote this letter that Richard had been wounded at Murfreesboro,
and lost a leg as a consequence. She reported in the letter that John had
been wounded in Richmond, but was recovering. Unlike her inference a year
before that all of the right sort had volunteered to fight for Southern
rights, she indicated that she was actively looking for substitutes for both
Richard and John, "I would give a negro a piece to get a substitute for you
and John." Her troubles were further complicated by the fact that her
overseer, James Brown, had been drafted; she could not afford to lose him
Richard and John returned from the war, but the Torrance family did not
escape from the ordeal unscathed. James Rufus Reid, son of Rufus and
Isabella Torrence Smith was killed at Manassas, Virginia on November 1, 1861
at age sixteen. All of their slaves were freed and ceased to be personal
property, and the value of their land decreased. There is only one recorded
incident of a former slave contracting to work at Cedar Grove. 47
John Torrance returned to Cedar Grove where he lived until his death in
1904 Richard Torrance remarried in 1865 to Patience Eliza Gaston of Chester,
SC. Eliza lived in Texas for a short time in 1867, but she returned to live
alternately with her mother in Chester and with her mother-in-law at Cedar
Grove, only periodically visiting Texas as long as Richard was there.
Richard hoped to sell his farm in order to settle in North or South Carolina
with is new wife and family. He was unable to leave Texas permanently until
1868. His primary problem was that his debts had exceeded that value of the
property. He also had tremendous difficulty finding labor for his farm.
Immediately after the war, freed slaves preferred to work for themselves
rather than for planters. Many former slaves did not remain in the areas
near their plantations, and those who did did not work on the same schedule
that they were forced to observe as slaves. Emancipation made agricultural
labor very expensive, and planters' primary concern from 1865-1870 was
finding enough labor that would work efficiently and cheaply. The planters
lament during this period was that black labor, was "indifferent,
inefficient, and simply unreliable." 48 Many historians beheve
that during this period, the ex-slaves attempted to assert their
independence and work according to the same schedule and routine as white
farmers. The deviation in the work patterns expected of blacks caused whites
to accuse them of laziness. The economic insecurity of the freedmen
ultimately forced them to accept contracts as tenant farmers or
In 1867, a series of letters to Eliza demonstrates the scope of the labor
shortage for people like Richard. There was no one in his region to hire,
which forced Richard Torrance to travel to contract labor for his
plantation. Eliza received letters from Texas, Alabama, Georgia, and
Virginia between January 13, 1867 and February 9, 1867, each letter
reporting that it was necessary for Richard to move farther east, then north
in search of tenant farmers or sharecroppers. His letter from Hampton,
Virginia begins "I reckon you will think I have gone stark mad, sure enough,
and maybe I have, but I am still trying to get hands." 50
Eliza returned to Chester in 1868 with the children, and Richard
faithfully wrote to her and she to him regarding his progress on the farm
and how much he missed his family. He wrote that he wished they could live
together, but "poverty prevents", and that he expected to only make a "few"
bales of cotton, and 2000 or 3000 bushels of corn, "barely enough to pay for
making the crop." 51
Richard had serious financial problems. As he explained in a letter to
Eliza, the postwar value of his property had plummeted, "...when this war
began my property was worth $75,000.00, now I aint worth a $1000.00-debts
all paid I aint worth a dollar." 52 The invasion of the "cotton
worm" destroyed most of Richard's cotton crop for 1868; he anticipated that
he would only make two bales that year. 53
In spite of their difficult situation, Richard and Eliza had reason to
celebrate. Their second child was born in 1868. Richard wrote to Eliza in
September, "Nineteen days have passed since your last of August 27 was
written and I suppose that dreaded time is passed also with you. I do hope
and trust safely for you both." 54 Circumstances continued to
improve for Richard and Eliza Torrance.
In October, he wrote to inform her that he would be home by December. He
planned to bring Bettie's remains with him because he could not bear to
leave them in Texas. Richard intended to rent Eliza's mothers farm as he did
not believe that Cedar Grove could support his mother, brother, and his
family of six. His happiness at the prospect of reuniting with his family
was marred by the realization that the future was uncertain and that the
postwar world promised to be radically different from the familiar routine
of his youth. 55
Richard Torrance ultimately returned to Mecklenburg County. He worked as
a tax collector and continued to farm at Cedar Grove. He lost an arm in a
cotton gin, and would have been dragged into the machine if a former slave
working with him, Sam Alexander, had not ripped off the belt that had caught
Torrance's arm. Eliza Torrance died in 1917, and Richard died in 1927.
John Torrance returned to Cedar Grove after serving with the "Mecklenburg
Wide Awakes", the Thirty-seventh Regiment of the North Carolina Infantry.
56 He managed the farm after his mother's death and continued to
operate the saw mill. His account book of 1866 shows a list of "workmen" who
were hired to work for one-third wages and two-thirds share of crops. This
accounting kept track of work days lost as well as the dry goods John
Torrance procured for these laborers. 57
Most of John Torrance's friends and family were concerned about his
drinking. A portion of his personal papers contain advertisements for cures
for drunkenness. Several of his friends advised him to take the Keeley cure
at a Keeley Institute conveniently located in Greensboro. His nephew Frank
Witherspoon was cured at a Keeley Institute and worked for the Keeley
Institute of Dallas, Texas. He gently offered to discuss the cure with his
uncle in the future. 58
After the deaths of John and Richard Torrance, Cedar Grove and its
surrounding property were divided into eleven parcels and distributed among
Richard Torrence's children. 59 The heirs drew lots to determine
who would receive each parcel. Delia Torrance Banks (b. 1871) drew the lot
which included Cedar Grove. 60
Delia Torrance worked as a stenographer with the firm of Clarkson and
Duls before she married Howard A. Banks. Howard Banks, a religious
journalist, began his career with the Charlotte Observer, then moved
to Philadelphia to write for the Sunday School Times. Banks
eventually published his own magazine, Christ's Life or the Word of the
Cross. Howard Banks died in 1932, and his family returned to Charlotte
to live with Kate Torrance Sanders (Delia's sister) in their home on Church
The current residents of Cedar Grove are Richard and Belle Banks.
Richard, the son of Delia and Howard Banks, moved his family into the house
in 1944, after installing central heating, electricity, and plumbing. Mr.
Banks wrote for the Charlotte Observer. He and his wife have been
instrumental in the preservation of both the plantation seat and the earlier
house and the store.
1 The family name changes spelling from Torance to
Torrence to Torrance. The changes were made by Hugh and later by
his son James. Hugh changed the spelling to distinguish himself from his
brother Albert's son Hugh Torrence of Salisbury. James Torrance spelled his
name Torrence until his marriage to his third wife, after which he spelled
it Torrance to differentiate himself from the Iredell County Torrences. When
referring to the property, Torrance will be used. Otherwise, various
historic spellings will be used.
2 Photocopy of original letter of Thomas Boyle (?) dated
August 20, 1763. Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 1.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte Special Collections, hereafter
3 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Folder 87, Series
4 The Battle of Ramsor's Mill was fought on June 20, 1780. A
Whig force of 300-400 led by Col. Francis Leake and Major Joseph McDowell
defeated the Tory forces of 1100 led by Lt. Col. John Moore. Hugh Lefler and
Albert Newsome. North Carolina, The History of a Southern State,
(Chapel Hill, 1973). p. 245.
5 Index and genealogical history prepared for Part I of the
Torrance-Banks Family Papers, UNCC.
6 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part 1, Box 1, Folder 2A, UNCC.
7 Photocopy of Inventory of the Estate of Hugh Torrence, May
24, 1816 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 1, UNCC.
8 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I. Box 1, Folder 15 B.
9 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 16. UNCC.
10 Torrance-Banks Family Papers,UNCC. James Torrance, Account
11 Most of the work that examines the regional transition from
a barter to a market economy in the early nineteenth century has been done
on regions of the northeast, however substantial work exists on the issue
from the southern perspective. The transition begins in the north by 1820,
and some areas in the south begin to show a strong market orientation by
1850. See Christopher Clark, "The Household Economy, Market Exchange, and
the Rise of Capitalism in the Connecticut Valley, 1800-1860", Journal of
Social History 13 Winter 1979: 169-90; Ford, Lacy K. "Rednecks and
Merchants: Economic Developinent and Social Tensions in the South Carolina
Upcountry, 1865-1900", Journal of American History 71 (September
1984): 294-318; James Henretta, "Families and Farms: 'Mentality' in
Pre-Industrial America", William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Series, 35
(January 1978): 333; Winifred Rothenberg, "The Market and Massachusetts
Farmers, 1750-1855", Journal of Economic History 41 (June 1981):
283-314; Lewis Athertori, The Southern Country Store, 1800-1860,
(1949); A Masters Thesis relative to this topic and more broadly concerned
with the plantation economy of north Mecklenburg is being written by UNCC
Master of Arts candidate David Blick.
12 Deeds recording the activity of Hugh Torance and James
Torrence may be found in the Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1,
Folder 2A. UNCC.
13 Mecklenburg was one of three Piedmont counties that could
count 50% of its inhabitants as slaves. Lefler and Newsome, p. 424.
14 Torrence-Banks Family Papers, Box 1, Folder 12, UNCC. The
slaves are listed in what appear to be family groups. The most recent
scholarship on slavery argues that in spite of the limitations of slavery,
slaves maintained families that were often centered around a male head of
household, and that they were able to build a world of their own. See: John
Blassingame, The Slave Community, Eugene Genovese, Roll, Jordan,
Roll, Herbert Gutmann, The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom,
and Kennth Stampp, The Peculiar Institution.
15 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Box 1, Folder 12. UNCC. Bill
"for Negroes" from Andrew Springs to James Torrence, August 28, 1837.
16 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Box 1, Folder 23 A. UNCC.
Letter to James Torrance from Hugh Torrence, Coffeeville, Mississippi,
February 7, 1838.
17 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Box 1, Folder 24 A. UNCC.
Letter to James Torrance from Jane Elizabeth Torrance, Salem, North
Carolina, July 2, 1835.
18 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part II, Box 3, Folder 44 B.
UNCC. Letter to Richard Allison Torrance from Margaret Allison Torrance,
Cedar Grove, August 3, 1862.
19 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 2, Folder 43 D,
Account Book 10, 1848-1870. UNCC.
20 Genovese, Roll, Jordan, Roll, 14; Stampp, The Peculiar
21 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 12.
UNCC. Agreement between Margaret Allison Torrance and James Brown, 1862.
22 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part 1, Box 1, Folder 8. UNCC.
23 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part 1, Box 1. Folder 16,
UNCC. Mill Book, 1831-1832; Census of Agriculture Manuscript, 1860,
24 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part I, Box 1, Folder 14.
Photocopy of p. 499 of Abstracts of Vital Records From Raleigh, N. C.
Newspapers, 1799-1819, by Lois S. Near. Entry 4673. Typhus was sometimes
used to describe a variety of fevers besides the specific disease.
25 James and Jane Latta had three daughters, Nancy, Betsy, and
Mary. Nancy (1801-1833) and Betsy (1797-1838) were the first and second
wives of Major Rufus Reid who married Isabella M. Torrence as his third
wife. All three of the Latta sisters were dead by 1838. Their mother, Jane
Knox Latta, survived until 1864.
26 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part 1, Box 2, Folder 43 B,
Account Book 4, Folders 19-20, and also included in this box is a typescript
by Mr. Richard Banks concerning the construction of Cedar Grove.
28 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part I, Box 1, Folder 23 A,
UNCC. Letter from Isabella Torrence Smith, Coffeeville, Mississippi, to
Camilla Torrence Latta, Feb. 27, 1837; letter from James Franklin Torrence.
Lusiscuna Valley, Miss., to James C. Torrance, June 17, 1837.
29 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 23 A.
UNCC. Letter from Hugh Torrence, Coffeeville, Mississippi, to James G.
Torrance, February 7, 1838.
30 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part 1, Box 1, Folder 23 A,
UNCC. Letter from James Franklin Torrence, Lusiscuna Valley, Mississippi, to
James G. Torrance, January 5, 1840.
31 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 23 B.
UNCC. Letter from Isabella Torrence Smith, Lusiscuna Valley, to James G.
Torrance, April 7, 1840.
32 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part I, Box 1. Folder 23 A.
UNCC Letter front Hugh Torrence, Coffeeville, Mississippi, to James G.
Torrance, February 7, 1838. It is apparent how lonely Isabella is in her
letter to James G. Torrance Apr. 7, 1840.
33 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, UNCC. Part I, Box 1, Folder
23 B. Letter from James Franklin Torrence, Lusiscuna Valley, Mississippi, to
James G. Torrance, September 3, 1840; Folder 26. Photocopy of Chalmers
Davidson, "Two Daughters of Mount Mourne", Briarpatch (March 1980):
34 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part I. Box 1. Folder 23 A.
UNCC. Letter from Isabella Torrence Smith, Coffeeville, Mississippi, to
James G. Torrance. Oct. 8, 1838.
35 Lefler and Newsome, North Carolina, p. 409. Salem
Academy later became Salem College.
36 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 24 A.
UNCC. Letters from Jane Torrence, Salem Female Academy, to James Torrance,
July 2, 1835, July 7, 1836, December 15, 1837. Jane attended Salem Female
Academy from the ages of ten to fourteen. Isabella attended Salem from ages
seven to nine, Camilla from eleven to fifteen, and from ages sixteen to
seventeen attended Lucretia Sarazen's Boarding School in Philadelphia.
37 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 24 A,
UNCC. Robert A. Sadler was hired by the community to teach orthography,
reading, writing, arithmetic, English, grammar, geography and surveying in
1827. He was paid two dollars a student, as well as boarding, washing,
firewood, and school house. Two of Sadler's students were James Franklin and
38 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 2, Folder 37,
UNCC. Davidson College Receipts. James Torrance initially subscribed $500.00
towards the establishment of the college and from 1844-1845 made
contributions to endow a professorship. William's fees were approximately
$35.00 per session (four sessions to the calendar year).
39 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, UNCC. In the
front of the notebook, Ney inscribed the following to Richard Torrance:
Time, lot, and chance may take away
Our wealth, but knowledge gained from Ney
Remains in fortunes darkest night
Resplendent as meridian light
Exalted minds will science gain,
Nor suffer life to pass in vain
Commanding time, they in the end
Endeavor to make God their friend.
40 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 2, Folder 41 B,
UNCC. Information concerning George Moses Horton and Richard Allison
Torrance from a photocopy of Robin Brabham, "To the Tip Top Belles of
Mecklenburg County: Two Acrostics by George Moses Horton", CLA Journal
30 (June 1987): 454-460.
41 Cathleen Clinton, The Plantation Mistress, Elizabeth
Fox-Genovese, Within the Plantation Household, Sally McMillen,
Motherhood in the Old South: Pregnancy, Childbirth, and Infant Rearing.
42 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 2, Folder 42.
43 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 1, Box 3,
Folder 44 A, UNCC. Letter from Bettie Torrance, Cedar Grove to Richard
Allison Torrance, February 15, 1858; Letter from Margaret Torrance, Cedar
Grove to Richard Allison Torrance, April 6, 1858.
44 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 1, Box 3,
Folder 44 B, UNCC. Letter from Margaret Torrance, Cedar Grove, to Richard
Torrance, July 10, 1861.
45 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 1, Box 3,
Folder 44 B, UNCC Letter from John Torrance, Cedar Grove, to Richard
Torrance, October 13, 1861.
46 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 1, Box
3, Folder 44 B, UNCC. Letter from Margaret Torrance, Cedar Grove, to Richard
Torrance, August 3, 1862. Another letter to Richard Torrance from a friend,
R. H. Leigh, complained, "Oh! This war. This war!! When will it end we are
so tired of it but the south can't stop until we gain our independence and
our rights..." April 5, 186?.
47 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part I, Box 1, Folder 12,
UNCC. On January 21, 1867 a woman named Vina bound herself and her four
children to work for Margaret Torrance for two years. Other such agreements
may have been executed, but do not exist in the record.
48 James Roark, Masters Without Slaves, p. 164.
49 See Roark, Masters Without Slaves, Eric Foner,
Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revoltuion, Roger Ransom and
Richard Sutch, One Kind of Freedom.
50 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 2, Box 5.
Folder 117, UNCC. See letters from Richard Torrance to Eliza Torrance,
January 13, 1867; January 22, 1867; January 25, 1867; January 29, 1867;
February 3, 1667; February 9, 1867.
51 Torrance-Banks Family Papers. Part II, Series 2, Box 5,
Folder 118. UNCC. Letter from Richard Torrance, Richmond, Texas, to Eliza
Torrance, June 29, 1868.
52 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 2, Box 5,
Folder 118, UNCC. Letter from Richard Torrance, Fort Bend, Texas, to Eliza
Torrance, July 26, 1868.
53 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 2, Box 5,
Folder 119, UNCC. Letter from Richard Torrance to Eliza Torrance, September
54 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 2, Box 5,
Folder 119, UNCC. Letter from Richard Torrance to Eliza Torrance, September
15, 1868. Richard and Eliza Torrance had nine children together, plus two
from Richard's first marriage, making a total of eleven children.
55 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 2, Box 5,
Folder 119, UNCC. Letter from Richard Torrance to Eliza Torrance, October
20, 1868. He wearily noted in his letter, "...if Grant is elected president
and I have no doubt he will be perhaps it would be better not to undertake
to make a crop with free negroes, who can tell, I can't."
56 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 3, Box 7,
Folder 178, UNCC. Copies of John Andrew Torrance's muster rolls.
57 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 3, Box 7,
Folder 181 A, UNCC.
58 Torrance-Banks Family Papers, Part II, Series 3, Box 6,
Folder, 156, UNCC. Letter from Framk Witherspoon, Dallas, Texas to John
Torrance, January 6, 1903. The appearance of national centers designed to
reform drunkenness was doubtless part of the general reforming spirit of the
early twentieth century.
59 Deed 731-295, October 6, 1928. Mecklenburg County Court
60 Interview with Mr. Richard Banks, March 1993.
Location and Site Description
Cedar Grove and the Hugh Torance House and Store are located on Gilead
Road, west of I-77 and the town of Huntersville. The Cedar Grove property
consists of three tax parcels: a 92.4 acre tract on the north side of Gilead
Road; a 9.05 acre tract, also on the north side of Gilead Road; and a 25
acre parcel on the south side of the road. The 92.4 acre, northern tract
contains the 1831-1833 plantation seat and four outbuildings. A brick
outbuilding, containing the well house and laundry, is situated just to the
rear of the house, and the granary, ice house, and horse shed (all wooden
frame structures) are located between the plantation house and McDowell
Creek, the western boundary of the property. The 9.05 arce site is vacant
and abuts the 92.4 are parcel to the east. The earlier Hugh Torance House
and Store rests on a 2.174 acre tract surrounded by the 92.4 acre Cedar
Grove parcel. There are no outbuildings remaining with this property.
Davidson College is currently conducting an archaeological investigation,
approximately 30 to 40 feet northwest of the house.
The 117.4 acres of land associated with two of the three Cedar Grove tax
parcels, the Cedar Grove plantation house, and the Cedar Grove well house
and laundry have already been designated as local landmarks. The granary and
ice house are in deteriorated condition, and the horse shed is inaccessible
and only partially visible. These three outbuildings should be excluded from
the designation, but the 9.05 are parcel, adjacent to the east, should be
added to the Cedar Grove designation because this contiguous acreage is part
of the historic Torrance estate. The proposed designation for the Hugh
Torance House and Store includes the interior and exterior of the one
building and the 2.174 are tract of land.
The Cedar Grove property, is bounded by McDowell Creek on the west side
and Torrence Creek to the south. The plantation seat and extant outbuildings
are all situated on a knoll, located east of McDowell Creek, on the north
side of Gilead Road. The knoll slopes northward and westward to encompass
creek bottomland. The well house is directly to the rear of the plantation
house, and the three other outbuildings are sited west of the house, just as
the land begins sloping toward the creek. A detached kitchen originally
stood northeast of the house, but this building is no longer extant. Gilead
load originally ran farther to the south, but now traverses the property,
north of the junction of the two boundary reeks. Woods now surround the
house on the north and west sides, making the three deteriorated
outbuildings largely inaccessible. To the east, an open field separates the
Greek Revival plantation house from the earlier Hugh Torance House and
Built between 1831 and 1833, the Cedar Grove plantation house is one of
the finest examples of
Greek Revival residential architecture in the state. 1 The
house is a monumental, two and one half story, with raised basement, brick
structure with a side
gable roof and
hipped roofed porches on the facade south elevation and rear elevation.
The house measures 60 x 40 feet, with a five bay width and double pile
depth, and central entrances in the front and rear elevations.
The exterior is distinguished by stepped, brick parapets, with corbeled
caps, which terminate the gable ends of the roof. Double, brick, end
chimneys are incorporated within the parapets, and corbeled, brick cornices
with full returns delineate the gable roof and create pediments below the
parapet line. The roof was originally covered in wooden shingles, but this
covering has been replaced with standing seam tin. The brick exterior walls
are laid in
Flemish bond, and the walls meet a simple, flat, wooden cornice on the
front and rear elevations. It is suggested that this cornice may be a
replacement with the corbeled cornice of the end gables ontinuing around to
the long elevations. 2 Gutter boxes along the overhanging eaves
of the facade are marked " 1831 ".
The porches extend across the center three bays of both the front and
rear elevations. The south porch rests on a tall brick base laid in
common bond. The base has heavy corner piers between which are
structural arches of alternating soldiers and rowlocks. Wide granite steps
lead to this porch. The shallow hip roof is supported by four stuccoed brick
Doric capitals, and the wide frieze is ornamented with scroll brackets
and flat panels, which appear to be later
Italianate additions. The frieze may have originally incorporated
triglyphs or some other characteristic Greek Revival element. 3
The rear porch is supported by four stuccoed, brick columns, but these
supports rest on a shallow", brick pier and stone slab base. Above the Doric
columns is a flat-panelled frieze. Parts of the brick foundation appear to
be a fairly recent replacement. The double transverse, wooden stairs are
also replacements. The basement is reached through a door located in the
east bay of the rear elevation.
The tall, main entrance contains recessed double doors, each composed of
five flat panels, paneled soffit and reveals, and heavy molded surrounds.
The entrance is capped by, a
transom light with tracery, but there are no
sidelights. Double wooden screened doors over the entrance. The rear
entrance is shorter, approximately six feet in height. A single, six paneled
door is found at this entrance, and the upper panels contain fixed lights.
The windows all have brick flat arches and granite sills. The first and
windows are nine-over-nine light, double hung, wooden sash, while the
short basement windows are six-over-six light. Under each gable end, there
is a single six-over-six light, double hung, wooden sash window. The
basement windows have paneled shutters hung on iron strap hinges, and the
upper stories have louvered shutters.
Cedar Grove has a double pile, central hall floor plan. The monumental
scale of the house creates an airy interior, with ceiling heights on the
first floor reaching approximately 13 feet. The four first floor rooms open
from the center hall, which terminates with a spiral
staircase in the northeast corner. This elegant, cantilevered staircase
rises in a open stairwell to the attic floor. The
railing is formed of simple square
balusters with a molded railing ending at a scrolled
newel, and the stair
risers are accented with tulip brackets. The hall has plaster walls;
molded chair railing; paneled
wainscoting; a wide, round-molded cornice, which forms a decorative band
on the ceiling; and tongue and groove, pine floors. The pairs of rooms,
flanking the hall, are connected by tall openings, which an be closed with
flat-paneled, folding doors. The two front rooms are larger that those to
Each of the first floor rooms is reached by a tall, six-paneled door with
flat-paneled reveals and soffits. Each room has plaster walls and ceilings;
wide, tongue and groove, pine flooring; and a fireplace. The ceilings are
delineated by heavy molded plaster cornices. The door and window surrounds
are fluted with bull's eye modillion corner blocks. In addition, the windows
have paneled soffits and reveals, which are splayed for enhancing the
In the two west rooms, there is no wainscoting or chair railing. The
front west room is used as a dining room, while the rear room is a kitchen.
The kitchen appliances and fixtures are largely removable so as to cause
little alteration to the historic fabric. The mantels on the west side have
Ionic columns supporting a simple frieze and molded shelf. The mantels
in the east rooms are similar but have
Access to the basement, second, and third floors was denied, but the plan
of the second floor is identical to the first. The only alteration on this
floor has been the partitioning of the northwest room to form a bathroom and
closet. The owners report, however, that they had the bathroom designed so
that the fixtures could be easily removed 4. The ornamentation in
these bedrooms is simpler than the those on the first floor, reportedly more
like that of the west rooms on the first floor. The mantels in the west
bedrooms are simpler Greek Revival versions with molded pilasters, frieze,
and a plain shelf. The mantels on the east side of the second floor have
only the molded shelf and panel. The third floor, finished in flushboard
siding, contains three rooms 5. The basement reportedly has two
Well House and Laundry
The well house is a small outbuilding which stands directly to the rear
of the plantation house. This brick building, laid in common bond, has a
standing seam tin, gable roof with exposed rafters. The west side of this
structure is an open shed and houses the well the well pulley, and wooden
base are still intact. The roof over the shed is supported by unsawn cedar
posts set into brick bases. A single door to the laundry is located on the
south side. There is a small window, located under the eaves, facing the
open well shed.
The plantation house associated with Cedar Grove is one of the finest
ante-bellum houses in Piedmont North Carolina. The house incorporates a
variety of traditional and classical features, such as the stepped parapets,
simple side gable form, and Federal staircase, with specific Greek Revival
elements, notably the Doric columns and pedimented gables, to create a
sophisticated, yet regional, interpretation of Neoclassical architecture
from the early nineteenth century. As the family, seat for the prominent
Torrance family, whose origins, settlement, and economic pursuits were
typical of many early Mecklenburg families, Cedar Grove represents the
height of ante-bellum cotton culture in the county.
Hugh Torance House and Store
The Hugh Torance House and Store is situated on the north side of Gilead
Road in a naturalistic clearing of recent vintage, approximately 100 yards
east of the plantation house. The plantation house is clearly visible across
an open field. A gravel drive runs along the east side of the Torance house;
woods border to the north, and a thin line of trees buffer the eastern
boundary. Gilead Road now runs close to the house, only roughly 50 feet to
The Hugh Torance House and Store is a one and one half and two story
building with a L-shaped plan, reflecting three building campaigns. The
original one room, log house (ca. 1780) occupies the northern section of the
building. The interior of the log house was later divided into two rooms: a
parlor, located in the northwest corner, and a store extending to the east.
Prior to the opening of the store in 1805, a small storage room had been
added, circa 1787, to the east end of the house. Final construction occurred
with the addition of a two-story, single pile, wood
frame house (built in 1796) to the south side of the parlor, which gave
the house its L-shaped plan 6 . With this last construction, the
facade was reoriented from the south elevation to the west, and the
principal entrance was moved to this federal addition. The entire building
is sided in lapped, beaded weatherboard. Some of the weatherboarding dates
to recent rehabilitation, but the new sheathing replicates the original. The
foundation is constructed of field stone, set with mud and clay, and pointed
with lime mortar. The
gable roofs are covered in replacement, wooden shingles. 7
The original section was a one and one half story, log house which once
contained one room and a garret, but this portion continues to reflect the
partitioning of the first floor into two rooms to accommodate the opening of
the store in 1805 8 . The weatherboarded log house has a side
gable roof with box eaves. The siding was attached with hand-wrought,
rose-headed nails. A massive stone chimney, with a single shoulder, is found
on the west elevation although physical evidence indicates that the stone
chimney was rebuilt in the twentieth century. 9
The two story Federal addition does not meet the earlier log house
neatly, but rather resembles on the exterior a one-third Georgian plan on
the first floor, while extending over to the ridge line of the log house on
the second floor. This division is still visible in the siding. However, it
seems that one first floor window was enlarged at this time to give the
facade a more classical appearance, so that on the south side of the stone
chimney, there are three asymmetrical bays. The smaller window openings
north of the chimney reflect the earlier period of construction.
The principal entrance on the west elevation is located in the center bay
of the Federal addition and consists of a single, paneled, wooden door with
transom light and molded door surrounds. Open, wooden, replacement steps
lead to the front door. This section of the house has nine-over-six light,
single hung, wooden sash
windows on the second floor and nine-over-nine on the first. The earlier
windows on this elevation are six-over-six light, single hung, wooden sash.
All first floor windows have molded surrounds. The federal addition has
wooden, paneled shutters while the older sections of the house have
diagonally-laid, batten shutters. A low cellar, lined in field stone, is
found at the southwest comer of the house, beside the front entrance. The
cellar is reached by a break in the foundation wall.
The south elevation of the federal addition is dominated by a single
shoulder, brick chimney, laid in
Flemish bond, with a corbeled brick cap. The chimney rises from the
stone house foundation. The bricks used in this chimney were handmade,
hard-burned and reputedly made on the site. 10 Tall, narrow,
six-over-six light, single hung, wooden sash windows flank the chimney on
the first floor, and six-over-four light windows are found on the second.
Small, square, divided light windows are located under the gable.
The east elevation repeats the facade although this elevation is only two
bays wide because the store projects from the northern half of the
elevation. The door and windows are identical to those on the facade.
The south elevation of the one and one half story, store section of the
log house is broken by two entrances, symmetrically placed, and a small,
single, six-over-six light, single hung, wooden sash window, located at the
corner where the federal addition and the log store meet. The door closest
to the house leads to the store while the easternmost door apparently
provides the only access to the storage room. These doors are particularly
notable. They are wide, solid, wooden doors, constructed of wide boards laid
diagonally in a basket weave pattern using handwrought nails. The doors have
molded surrounds, but no transom or sidelights. These entrances are reached
by the same open, wooden steps found on the facade. When the storage room
was added in the 1780s, heavy mill-sawn studs were used instead of log for
the exterior walls, and sawn members were also used in the rafters and floor
joists 11 .
The rear elevation of the ell has only two small openings, located in the
center, but not aligned with the asymmetrical gable roof. On the first
floor, there is a six-over-six light, single hung, wooden sash, square
window, similar to the others found on the other elevations of the ell and
the log section. Leading to a storage loft, the upper level opening is
protected only by shutters.
The north elevation of the ell is aligned with the original house. The
land slopes slightly toward the west so that a break in the foundation and
weatherboarding reveals the division between the store and storage room.
Otherwise the only openings in this wall are an entrance, leading to the log
house, and a window, located roughly in the middle of this long wall. The
window is identical to the other six-over-six light, single hung, wooden
sash windows found on the ell. The door is identical to the doors on the
The first floor of the Hugh Torance House and Store contains four rooms:
two associated with the original log house; the storage room, located at the
east end; and one more formal room added with the Federal-era alterations.
The two principal entrances to the house enter directly into the federal
addition from the east and west elevations. The walls, floors, and ceiling
in this room are all constructed of wide, pine, tongue and groove boards.
The unpainted wall boards are laid horizontally except along the interior
partition wall, which is composed of single thickness, tongue and groove,
vertical boards. The six panel door in this wall is a more sophisticated
example of Federal styling than the exterior doors, which are vernacular
six-paneled doors of batten construction with iron H-L hinges and iron box
locks. The room contains finely crafted classical features such as molded
baseboards, crown moldings, and chair railings. A narrow, open, two run
staircase is located against the interior wall in the northwest corner
of the room adjacent to the facade entrance and rising next to the door
leading to the oldest section of the house. The staircase is distinguished
by slender, square, fluted
newel, with molded
risers, and baseboards. A two-paneled door, located under the staircase,
opens into a small closet. In the center of the south wall is a handsome
vernacular Federal mantel with fluted pilasters, a narrow, molded mantel,
and a paneled overmantel reaching to the ceiling. The fireplace is
The earlier parlor is situated directly north of the federal parlor, and
is characterized by the same unpainted, wide, pine, flushboard paneling,
floors, and ceiling. The wall boards in this room are laid vertically. The
crown molding, chair railing, baseboard, and door and window surrounds also
repeat the classical molding profiles found in the south room. on the north
wall is one exterior door; a door on the south wall leads to the Federal
room; and a third door on the east wall leads to the store. The door on the
north wall is constructed of vertical interior boards with diagonal exterior
battens, laid in a basket weave pattern. Handwrought roseheaded nails attach
the battens and long iron strap hinges, and the doors are secured by
hand-wrought, iron lift latches. On the south interior wall is an inset
cupboard above the chair railing, and the cupboard has a divided light door.
The door to the store is paneled with a multiple light midsection which
allows a view of the store counter from the fireplace. The west wall is
defined by a stone fireplace flanked by two windows. Although the fireplace
was apparently reworked at some time during the twentieth century, the
nicely detailed, vernacular Federal mantel with slender, fluted pilasters,
and a delicately molded mantel shelf is original. In the southwest corner of
this room is a recessed hatch in the ceiling leading to the attic.
The store also has vertical, pine, flushboard walls and molded chair
railing, baseboard, and crown molding. Exposed rafters form the ceiling to
this room. The enclosed, wooden counter, located in roughly the enter of the
room and extending to the rear wall, is a replacement. Open, display shelves
line the north wall, flanking a single window. On the south wall is one of
the earliest doors in the house, which is constructed of vertical boards
with an iron box lock and long, iron strap hinges. On the west side of the
door is a small window. Both the door and the windows feature the same
classical surrounds found throughout the house.
The second floor of the house has the same floor plan as the first. The
stairs in the Federal addition lead directly into a large room with walls of
unpainted, pine, vertical flushboards although on the south wall, the wall
boards are laid horizontally. This room also repeats the classical detailing
- chair railing, baseboards, surrounds, and crown molding - found on the
first floor. The mantel is a fine example of vernacular Federal construction
with delicate, fluted pilasters, narrow, molded mantel, classical fireplace
surrounds, and paneled overmantel. A six-paneled door on the north wall
leads to the garret bedroom, located above the log house. A section of the
garret was remodeled at the time of the Federal addition to become a full
second story bedroom.
The garret room is finished with horizontal flushboard walls and
classical crown molding, baseboard, and surrounds. There is a single window
on the west wall, and a door on the east wall opens into the attic loft. The
attic is unfinished, but contains a window on the west wall and a shuttered
opening under the east gable. A wide, tongue and groove, board floor has
been laid over the rafters in sections of the attic loft. The pole rafters,
lapped and pegged at the ridgeline, are visible, and crossbracing is
provided by horizontal members and a metal tie rod, extending from north to
south. The Roman numerals used to identify the individual rafters are
apparently still visible, and the metal tie rod was added around the turn of
the eighteenth century 12 .
The Hugh Torance House and Store was in deteriorated condition until the
recent past, and some historic fabric was not extant at the time that
rehabilitation and restoration began. However, important features of the
house have survived, notably mantels, window detailing, doors, some
hardware, and brick chimney. Rehabilitation has been undertaken, and where
replacements have been necessary, these have been in-kind. Specifically,
termite damage and deterioration have required the replacement of some
exterior weatherboard siding and some interior paneling. Some window glass
has also been replaced, and where possible historic glass has been used. In
addition, a HVAC system and alarm have been added to protect the property,
and inset spot lighting has also been inserted into the ceilings.
The Hugh Torance House and Store is a rare eighteenth and early
nineteenth century survivor in Mecklenburg County. The combination of
functions represented in this building, as well as the clearly defined
construction campaigns, only underscore the uniqueness and importance of
this property. The association of this house, both through ownership and
proximity, with adjacent Cedar Grove illustrates economic, social, and
architectural developments in the county from the settlement period to the
1 Cedar Grove has been called, "...an especially fine and
well-documented example of builders ready adoption of the Greek Revival
style." Catherine Bishir, North Carolina Architecture, Chapel Hill:
University, of North Carolina Press, 1990, 198.
2 Cedar Grove, National Register of Historic Places Nomination
Form, 1974, Part 7- 1.
3 Cedar Grove, National Register of Historic Places Nomination
Form, 1974, Part 7- 1.
4 Interview with Richard T. Banks, 9 Mar. 1993.
5 Cedar Grove, National Register Nomination, Part 7-2.
6 Interview with Ann Williams, Hugh Torance House and Store
Board, 18 May 1993.
7 "Cedar Grove," unpublished report prepared by Jack O. Boyte,
A.I.A., n.d., p. 1. Torrence Family Papers, Special Collection of the
University of North Carolina at Charlotte Library.
8 Boyte, "Cedar Grove," p. 1.
9 Boyte, "Cedar Grove," p. 2.
10 Boyte, "Cedar Grove," p. 4.
11 Boyte, "Cedar Grove," p. 3.
12 Interview with Ann Williams, Hugh Torance House and Store,
18 May 1993.
Survey & Research Report: Torrance Mill