James Morrow Coffey House
1. Name and location of the property: The property known as the
Coffey House is located at 3300 Shopton Road, Charlotte, NC 28217.
2. Name, address, and telephone number of the present owner of the
property: The present owner of the property is:
Bernice Tate
3300 Shopton Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone: (704) 588-1567
3. Representative photographs of the property: This report
contains representative photographs of the property.
4. A map depicting the location of the property: This report
contains maps depicting the location of the property.
5. Current Deed Book Reference to the property: The most recent
deed to the property is found in Deed Book 4472, page 931. The tax parcel
number for the property is 141-071-05.
6. A brief historical sketch of the property: This report contains
a brief historical sketch of the property prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.
7. A brief architectural description of the property: This report
contains an architectural description prepared by Emily D. Ramsey.
8. Documentation of why and in what ways the property meets the
criteria for designation set forth in N.C.G.S. 160A-400.5:
a. Special significance in terms of its history, architecture,
and/or cultural importance: The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic
Landmarks Commission judges that the Coffey House possesses special
significance in terms of Charlotte-Mecklenburg. The Commission bases its
judgment on the following considerations:
1) The James Morrow Coffey House is a tangible reminder of the importance
of farming to the agrarian economy of post-bellum Mecklenburg County.
2) James Morrow Coffey and his descendents were influential members of the
Steele Creek Community.
3) The James Morrow Coffey House, built in 1886, is an excellent example
of an evolving 19th century farm complex the house and surrounding
outbuildings reflect the diverse and self-sufficient existence led by most
farmers in late 19th and early 20th century Mecklenburg County.
b. Integrity of design, setting, workmanship, materials, feeling,
and/or association: The Commission judges that the architectural
description completed by Emily D. Ramsey demonstrates that the James
Morrow Coffey House meets this criterion.
9. Ad Valorem Tax Appraisal: The Commission is aware that
designation would allow the owner to apply for an automatic deferral of 50%
of the Ad Valorem taxes on all or any portion of the property which becomes
a designated "historic landmark." The current appraised value of the 5.800
acres and all improvements is $131,400. The property is zoned R3.
Date of Preparation of this Report:September 1, 2000
Prepared by:Emily D. Ramsey
745 Georgia Trail
Lincolnton, NC 28092
Statement of Significance
The James Morrow Coffey House, erected in 1886, is a property that
possesses local historic significance as a tangible reminder of the
importance of farming and rural life in the booming agrarian economy of post
Civil War Mecklenburg County, and for its association with James Morrow
Coffey and his son, Rufus Coffey, both prominent members of the Steele Creek
Community's circle of well-to-do farmers and active members of the Central
Steele Creek Presbyterian Church. The last half of the nineteenth century
saw tremendous opportunity for farming communities around Charlotte.
Charlotte had escaped relatively unscathed from the effects of the Civil War
and the continually high demand for cotton, coupled with the development of
the fertilizer Peruvian guano in 1860, made the post-bellum period a
prosperous time for farming in Mecklenburg County. Although James Morrow
Coffey owned five slaves at the time of the Civil War, the bulk of his
farming operations, like those of most farmers in Mecklenburg County, did
not depend on slave labor, and he, along with his son, Rufus Alexander
Coffey, was able to profit handsomely from the post-war prosperity.
The James Morrow Coffey House is also significant as an excellent example
of a nineteenth century farm complex. The typical farm in late 19th and
early 20th century Mecklenburg County supported not only cash crops like
cotton and corn, but also an array of livestock (mainly hogs, cows, and
chickens), kitchen gardens for family consumption, and fruit trees. In
addition, many farmers operated their own blacksmith shops, smokehouses, and
cotton gins. Most farms, therefore, consisted of an array of barns, storage
sheds, and other outbuildings in addition to the farmhouse itself. The
evolution of the James Morrow Coffey house, originally a simple one-pile
I-house, reflects the growing and changing needs of farming families in late
nineteenth and early twentieth century Mecklenburg County, and the
collection of outbuildings which surround the house speak to the diverse
nature of rural life in the area.
Historical Overview
The last half of the nineteenth century was a time of tremendous growth
and change in Charlotte and Mecklenburg County. The coming of the railroad
in 1852 and its rapid expansion before and after the Civil War made
Charlotte "an excellent location for trade and industry."1
Charlotte quickly developed into a bustling and vital trading center for a
region that covered "fourteen counties in North Carolina and at least eleven
in South Carolina."2 By far the most lucrative business for the
burgeoning city was trade in cotton. Cotton, an important crop to the area's
economy before the Civil War, had become even more vital in the post- bellum
period. Cotton prices skyrocketed after the war and the introduction of the
fertilizer Peruvian guano in 1860 made cotton easy to grow even in the most
inhospitable soil.3 These favorable economic conditions gave
farmers outside the county's small circle of large slaveholders the
opportunity to "replant and recover quickly" after the war.4
Although James Morrow Coffey owned five slaves at the time of the Civil
War, the bulk of his farming operations, like those of the majority of
farmers in Mecklenburg County, did not depend on slave labor, and he, along
with his son, Rufus Alexander Coffey, was able to profit handsomely from the
post-war prosperity.5 James Morrow Coffey had come to the Steele
Creek area in the early 1850s, eventually acquiring over 300 acres of land
along the Moore branch of Big Sugar Creek (the branch is now known as Coffey
Creek). James Morrow, his wife, Eliza Alexander Coffey (granddaughter of
Ezra Alexander, one of the signers of the Mecklenburg Declaration of
Independence) and their five surviving children lived in a series of humble
log houses on their large farm.6 Such log homes were typical of
Scotch-Irish farmers like the Coffeys, whose ancestors had learned the
building techniques from German immigrants in Pennsylvania and brought the
building style with them to the Carolina piedmont.7 The Coffey
family quickly became enmeshed in the closely-knit community of farming
families around Steele Creek. The Coffeys, the Spratts, the Griers, the
Watts, and the McDowells were among these influential local families, who
were joined by marriage, business transactions, shared religious beliefs and
community social activities. James Morrow Coffey and his family were active
members of the Central Steele Creek Presbyterian Church, the largest
Presbyterian Church in Steele Creek, and all three of the Coffey daughters
married into the Spratt family, close neighbors of the Coffeys.8
After his wife's death in 1870, James Morrow Coffey continued his farming
operations in Steele Creek, with the help of his youngest son, Rufus Coffey.
James and Rufus (who was twenty-two at the time of his mother's death)
planted crops such as wheat, cotton and corn for profit, logged their acres
of woodland for timber (mainly pine and hickory) and raised livestock
primarily hogs and chickens.9 Excerpts from James Morrow Coffey's
diary reveal the day-to-day operations of his farm: "February 1, 1871 Sold
corn to Mr. Turner - - 5 bushels; June 15, 1871 Crops look fine today.
Wheat crop is very, very fine; June 15, 1871 Commenced laying by cotton;
July 7, 1871 Thunder storm and rain from the West. Powerful rain."10
In the favorable post-war economy, father and son were finally able to
build a house to reflect their success and rising status in the Steele Creek
community. A larger house was also needed to accommodate Rufus, his wife,
Amanda Utley Coffey, and their rapidly growing family. In 1886, James Morrow
Coffey and Rufus Coffey erected a new farmhouse to replace the log house
that had been their home. The new house, a two-story, one-pile I-house, was
a conservative choice in the Victorian era of fancy spindlework and
elaborate detailing, and gave the image of a prosperous but modest family.
Here, James Morrow Coffey lived out the last seven years of his life,
surrounded by his son, daughter-in-law, and ten grandchildren. He remained
an active member of the community, serving as elder of districts one and two
for the Central Steele Creek Presbyterian Church.11 Upon his
father's death in 1893, Rufus Coffey (a widower since his wife's death the
year before) inherited the farm in Steele Creek, including the house, the
outbuildings and a substantial amount of land (over 200 acres). Here he
reared his ten young children and continued operation of the family farm.12
Rufus Coffey's detailed diary entries provide a very vivid picture of
life on the Coffey farm in the early twentieth century. Although he never
remarried, Rufus Coffey shared the farmhouse (which he had expanded around
1900) with his son Willie and his two spinster daughters, Amanda Rose and
Eula. Willie was given much of the responsibility over the various types of
farm work as his father grew older, including the planting and tending of
the cash crops of cotton and corn, the care and slaughter of hogs (the
primary livestock on the farm) and the chopping, sawing, hauling, and sale
of pine, oak and hickory logged from the family's land. Eula and Amanda Rose
tended to the kitchen gardens and orchards, which produced an impressive
array of vegetables and fruits, including "potatoes, corn, cucumbers, butter
beans, cabbage, turnips, white peas, tomatoes, cherries, pears, grapes and
peaches."13 Eula herself cared for over ninety chickens, and the
two women were in charge of all of the cooking and cleaning in the house.
Rufus Coffey's twin daughters managed to maintain an active social life
with neighboring families in spite the heavy domestic workload on the farm.
They often traveled to visit or stay with acquaintances and attend various
social engagements, as Rufus Coffey's diary recorded: "Amanda and Eula road
with the McDowell's to Shopton to a Society Meeting; Amanda went to a
Layman's Meeting; Eula at Bessie Grier's at the annual picknic [sic] of the
Griers and Coffeys today"14
When Rufus Alexander Coffey died in 1935 at the age of 87, the farm was
divided into eight lots, a plot for each of his surviving children. The
farmhouse was left to Eula and Amanda Rose Coffey, who, according to a 1948
Charlotte Observer article, maintained their family home as a "museum
of surprises and curiosities [where] stored away in antiquated trunks,
chests of drawers, and other safe places are hundreds of valuable papers and
curious odds and ends historians would revel in."15 Amanda Rose
and Eula carefully preserved and displayed their family artifacts - old
furniture, antique china, old clothes, a Civil War blanket, and diaries kept
by James Morrow Coffey and Rufus Coffey.16 Amanda Rose and Eula
Coffey were the last descendents of James Morrow Coffey to live in the
house. After their deaths, the house passed to Sue Coffey Cathey, then to
her son, Kenneth Cathey. In 1974, Stokes and Eleanor Seegers purchased the
home and five acres of the original farmland. The Seegers renovated the
house, which had been vacant for several years and was in a state of
disrepair. In 1981, the couple sold the house to James H. Tate and his wife,
Bernice N. Tate. Bernice Tate, who became sole owner of the property upon
her husband's death, presently occupies the house.
Architectural Description
Architecturally, the James Morrow Coffey House, a simple two-story,
one-pile I-house with several later additions, reflects the conservatism
that persisted among the rural population in Mecklenburg County. In the
post-railroad period of the late nineteenth century, Victorian architecture
was at the height of its popularity in America, and Charlotte-Mecklenburg
was no exception. Even the most modest houses could be transformed into
Victorian cottages with the addition of mass-produced Victorian spindlework
and filigree. However, houses like the Coffey house demonstrate that,
despite the popularity of the Victorian style, "traditional forms [the most
prevalent of which was the I-house form] and simple interpretations of
styles continued to hold sway . . ." in rural Mecklenburg County.17
The continually evolving floor plan of the James Morrow Coffey house - which
began in 1886 as a simple one-pile I-house, and had become by the
mid-twentieth century a sprawling, irregular gable-front-and-wing farmhouse
also illustrates how rural houses constantly changed to meet the growing
and changing needs of farming families in the late nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries.
The James Morrow Coffey House is also significant as an excellent example
of a nineteenth century farm complex. The typical farm in late nineteenth
and early twentieth century Mecklenburg County supported not only cash crops
like cotton and corn, but also an array of livestock (mainly hogs, cows, and
chickens), kitchen gardens for family consumption, and fruit trees. In
addition, many farmers operated their own blacksmith shops, smokehouses, and
cotton gins. Most farms, therefore, consisted of an array of barns, storage
sheds, and other outbuildings in addition to the farmhouse itself. The
remaining outbuildings at the James Morrow Coffey house are a significant
part of the site, because, as historians Richard Mattson and William Huffman
explain, "the more historically complete and intact the farmyard, the more
it reveals about the operations of the farm" and the diverse activities that
made up daily life on that farm.18 The James Morrow Coffey Farm
retains many of its original outbuildings and a sense of it original rural
setting in an area where rural resources, and intact farm complex's in
particular, are rapidly disappearing.
The four remaining outbuildings on the property date from the early
nineteenth century to the early twentieth century. The oldest and most
significant outbuilding is a small side-gable log structure with
half-dovetail notching and a metal sheet roof, which most likely
predates the house itself. The original use of the log structure is debated
a 1948 Charlotte Observer article claims the building was a slave
home, and later accounts claim that it was originally a kitchen. No hearth
remains to confirm that the outbuilding was either a kitchen or a slave
home, although an opening does exist through the roof of the building that
suggests it might have been used as a small tenant house or a kitchen after
its original use was abandoned.
The other outbuildings on the property are less substantial
frame buildings, suggesting early to mid-twentieth century construction.
A large barn sits at the rear of the property, near the edge of a field. It
is a front-gable structure with a long shed extending off of one side. A
smaller side-gable frame structure, topped with a sheet metal roof, (which
some reports claim was originally a granary) sits closer to the rear of the
house. A small chicken coop and shed, both frame construction with slanting
metal roofs, perch near the northwest side of the house.
The James Morrow Coffey House itself is of wood frame construction,
sheathed in wooden clapboards and recently covered with aluminum siding. The
original two-story I-house, three-bays-wide and one-bay-deep, is now
partially obscured by a turn-of-the-century gable front addition projecting
from the right side of the house's facade (most likely added by Rufus Coffey
to accommodate his large family). A covered porch runs the length of the
house's facade, and was probably added at the same time as the front
addition. The porch features simple, understated square wooden posts and a
hipped roof. Several ells have been attached to the rear of the house as
well. The largest of these later additions is the kitchen ell - most likely
a detached kitchen which was attached to the house sometime in the early
twentieth century. A small second-story one-room addition was added to the
rear of the house, above the kitchen ell, and a small one-story shed was
built onto the rear of the house at some point. An enclosed porch and wooden
deck, both constructed after 1981, extend from the rear of the house and
along the kitchen ell. The house features regularly punctuated
fenestration with
six-over-six and four-over-four configurations. The house's two original
brick chimneys, laid in
common bond with fieldstone bases, still remain, although one was
rebuilt in the early twentieth century using bricks from the original
chimney.
Stokes and Eleanor Seegers, who purchased the house in 1974, installed
central heat, insulation, extra wiring, plumbing, bathrooms, modern
appliances and new cabinets in the kitchen. They also filled in the house's
foundation (originally the house sat on brick piers) with bricks "from
sections of downtown Charlotte that were being razed."19 Despite
these changes, many significant interior details remain. The original
fireplaces are sealed off, but still intact, and the Seegers left all of the
house's board and batten walls and ceiling, as well as the beaded paneling
in some of the rooms, exposed. All of the house's original wooden doors are
intact, as are the hardwood floors. The board and batten staircase features
simple turned newels and square posts. The James Morrow Coffey House remains
an excellent example of a late-nineteenth century farm complex, and a
visible reminder of the evolving needs of farmers in the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries.
Notes:
1 Thomas W. Hanchett, "The Growth of Charlotte: A History"
(Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, 1985). By 1861 four
railroads converged in Charlotte: the Charlotte and South Carolina Line to
Columbia, SC; the North Carolina Railroad through Greensboro and Salisbury,
NC; the Atlantic, Tennessee and Ohio line to Statesville, NC; and
theWilmington, Charlotte and Rutherford Railroad connecting Charlotte and
Lincolnton, NC.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid. Sherry J. Joines and Dr. Dan L. Morrill, "Historic
Rural Resources in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina"
(Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission, 1997).
4 Joines and Morrill, "Historic Rural Resources in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina."
5 Eighth Census of the United States: Slave Schedule,
Mecklenburg County (1860). James Morrow Coffey owned five slaves in
1860: one female, age 39; one male, age 19; one male, age 10; one female,
age 5; one female, age 2.
6 Charlotte Observer (May 30, 1948), Sec. 4, p. 1.
Ezra Alexander Family Tree, researched by Tom Taylor. James Morrow Coffey
and Eliza Alexander Coffey had six children: Mary (1828-1893); Margaret
(1833-1887); James S. (1835-1858); Benjamin (1842-1952); Sarah (1845-1930);
and Rufus (1848-1935).
7 Dr. Richard Mattson and Dr. William Huffman. "Historical
and Architectural Resources of Rural Mecklenburg County." (North Carolina
Division of Archives and History, July, 1990), Sec. F, p.2 & 16.
8 Caroline Wells, "Historical Sketch of the Coffey Family."
p. 1-2 (Charlotte, 1998).
9 Ninth Census of the United States: Agricultural Schedule
of Mecklenburg County (1870).
10 Charlotte Observer (May 30, 1948), Sec. 4, p.2.
11 Linda Lawless Blackwelder. A History of Central Steele
Creek Presbyterian Church (Charlotte 1984), p.132.
12 Estate Records Office Index to Wills 1763-December 1,
1968, Vol. A-D, Book M, p.230. Rufus and Amanda's ten children were:
James M. (1873-1957); Claude (1874-1910); Sue A. (1876-1950); Lelia B.
(1872-1952); twins Eula and Emma Utley (1884-196?); Jessie B. (1875-1945);
Lamar A. (1888-1889?); William "Willie" Howard (1890-????) and Amanda Rose
(1892-1984).
13 Caroline Wells, "Historical Sketch of the Coffey Family."
p. 3 (Charlotte, 1998). Entries from Diary of Rufus A. Coffey, dated
January 30, 1922 & February 27, 1923.
14 Entries from Diary of Rufus A. Coffey, dated February 27,
1923 & August 3, 1933.
15 Charlotte Observer (May 30, 1948), Sec. 4, p.2.
16 Charlotte Observer (June 6, 1948), Sec. 8, p. B.
17 Mattson and Huffman. "Historical and Architectural
Resources of Rural Mecklenburg County." Sec. F, p. 18-19.
18 Ibid, p. 26.
19 Charlotte News (January 1974).
|